Dissipation Rate of a Propagating EM Wave

uawildcat2008
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have a loop antenna I have been messing around with for a few years and I understand most of the physics behind it, especially with regards to Faraday's Law of Induction; however, I'm trying to work backwards now to determine a source voltage at a distance. For example, if a propagating EM wave comes in contact with my antenna in the horizontal creating 2 volts of induced charge while a lightning strike occurs, say, 20 km away in the vertical, how do I determine the lightning's voltage? Do I simply use 1/r^2 for linearity and 1/r^3 for point charge determinations or another equation? Also, what would be the proper unit notation - V/m or V/km or something completely different?

Many Thanks,
- uawildcat2008
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The voltage in your circuit is equal to the rate of change of magnetic flux through the circuit, the lightning can be modeled as an instantaneous electric dipole current, which creates a pulse of magnetic field. So what you can determine is the rate of change of the lightning current, if you know the surface area of your circuit and its orientation relative to the dipole current. I don't think you can determine anything else from your measurement.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top