Distance from potential difference

AI Thread Summary
A metal sphere with a radius of 15 cm and a net charge of 4.2x10^-8C has a potential decrease of 500V that needs to be calculated. The correct approach involves finding the potential difference between a point just outside the sphere and a point at a larger radius. The equation V = kQ/r can be used, treating the sphere as a point charge due to its spherically symmetric charge distribution. The final distance calculated from the sphere's surface is approximately 0.0371 m, which should be expressed in centimeters for consistency with the given radius. Understanding the behavior of the electric field as that of a point charge is supported by mathematical proofs similar to Newton's gravitational shell theorem.
Sho Kano
Messages
372
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A metal sphere of radius 15 cm has a net charge of 4.2x10^-8C. At what distance from the sphere's surface has the electric potential decreased by 500V?

Homework Equations


V = kQ/r

The Attempt at a Solution


\Delta V\quad =\quad \frac { kQ }{ r } \\ \\ r\quad =\quad \frac { kQ }{ \Delta V } \\ r\quad =\quad \frac { 9e9*4.2e-8 }{ 500 } \\ =\quad 0.756\quad m

What is wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are looking for a potential difference, not a particular potential. Find the potential difference between a point located adjacent to the sphere (ro ≅ 15 cm) and one located at some larger radius r1. Once you know r1 you should be able to find the required distance.
 
gneill said:
You are looking for a potential difference, not a particular potential. Find the potential difference between a point located adjacent to the sphere (ro ≅ 15 cm) and one located at some larger radius r1. Once you know r1 you should be able to find the required distance.
In a metal sphere the charge is distributed to the surface right?
Can I use V = kq/r for a sphere? It seems a bit weird to me, can you explain? Maybe I just don't understand the voltage equation..
 
Sho Kano said:
In a metal sphere the charge is distributed to the surface right?
Can I use V = kq/r for a sphere? It seems a bit weird to me, can you explain? Maybe I just don't understand the voltage equation..
For a charged conducting sphere, all the charge will be located at its surface. For any spherically symmetric charge distribution the electric field external to the sphere behaves as though the total charge were a point charge located at the center of the sphere.

So yes, you can use V = kq/r for the sphere.
 
gneill said:
For a charged conducting sphere, all the charge will be located at its surface. For any spherically symmetric charge distribution the electric field external to the sphere behaves as though the total charge were a point charge located at the center of the sphere.

So yes, you can use V = kq/r for the sphere.
If it's not too much trouble, why does it behave like a point charge? Is it through some kind of mathematical proof?
 
Sho Kano said:
If it's not too much trouble, why does it behave like a point charge? Is it through some kind of mathematical proof?
Yes. It's the same method as for Newton's gravitational shell theorem.
 
gneill said:
Yes. It's the same method as for Newton's gravitational shell theorem.
Sorry, for the late response. The answer that I'm getting is 0.0371 m?
 
Looks good. You should probably express it in cm since the sphere radius was given in those units.
 
gneill said:
Looks good. You should probably express it in cm since the sphere radius was given in those units.
Good advice, the tricky part was just one of the steps involved putting d+r in the voltage equation.
Thanks for the help!
 
Back
Top