Calculating Force R: Distributed Load Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force R from a distributed load, specifically addressing the use of the value "800 N/m." The calculation provided in the solution involves breaking the trapezoidal load into a constant and a triangular load, ultimately arriving at R = 360 N. Some participants argue that the average distributed load method is simpler, yielding the same result by multiplying the average load of 600 N/m by the member's length. The conversation critiques the complexity of the original method while confirming the final force R value remains consistent at 360 N. The thread highlights differing approaches to solving the problem while emphasizing the importance of clarity in calculations.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://postimg.org/image/7vpxry28t/


Can someone explain how they calculated the force R representing the distributed load?
Did they even make use of the value "800N/m" from the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation for R is included in the solution section. You don't need to use the 800 N/m unless you calculated the value of R using the formula for the area of a trapezoid:

R = (0.6/2)*(400 + 800) = 360 N

I think they are trying to show how to break up a trapezoidal load into a constant distributed load and a triangular load.
 
Last edited:
princejan7 said:

Homework Statement



http://postimg.org/image/7vpxry28t/



Can someone explain how they calculated the force R representing the distributed load?
Did they even make use of the value "800N/m" from the question?
Yes, they used the 800, but they obtained the force R result a stupid (IMHO) way. The way I would have done it would have been to note that the average distributed load over the length of the member is 600 N/m. If we multiply that by the length of the member (0.6), we get 360 N. They did something like the following: the minimum distributed load over the length of the member is 400 N/m, so this contributes 400 (0.6) = 240N. Over and above that, the remainder of the load varies from 0 at the left end to 400 at the right end (400 to 800, minus the 400 already accounted for). The average of this excess is (0+400)/2 = 200. The load contribution of this excess is (400/2)(0.6)=120N. The total load R is again 360 N. As I said, their method is kinda stupid.

Chet
 
thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top