Distribution of surface materials and friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between surface material distribution and friction, specifically in the context of sliding a plastic box attached to a wooden box down a track. It questions whether changing the arrangement of these materials would impact friction. Participants generally agree that switching the materials' positions would not significantly affect friction under normal conditions. Some acknowledge theoretical scenarios where it might, but they are deemed impractical. The conversation highlights the challenge of finding relevant terminology and theories related to this topic.
pwoh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to search for information relating to friction and a surface with different parts made of different materials.

For example, a plastic box is attached to a wooden box and slid down a track. If we were to switch how the plastic and wood was distributed on the surface, e.g. by swapping the boxes around, would this affect the friction?

I'm trying to find some theory that would relate to this but I'm having trouble finding the right terminology for it. Can anyone help?

Thanks in advanced :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If we were to switch how the plastic and wood was distributed on the surface, e.g. by swapping the boxes around, would this affect the friction?

no. Can you think of ANY possible reason it would?

I can think of some impractical potential situations, but nothing very real.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top