Do Electrons need Energy to Excite the EM field?

Ryan Reed
Messages
50
Reaction score
4
Electrons have both mass and electromagnetic charge, so why is it that an electron's rest energy is equal to its mass energy with E=mc^2? Shouldn't it have some energy left over to excite the electromagnetic field? The mass energy excites the Higgs field, so why is there no energy for the EM field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The particle property associated with EM is charge, no "charge energy" is used up to make an excitation of the EM field producing a virtual photon.
The particle property associated with higgs is mass... you will notice that the particle does not lose mass energy to excite the higgs field producing the higgs boson.
Note: you cannot do physics by analogy.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Ryan Reed said:
Electrons have both mass and electromagnetic charge, so why is it that an electron's rest energy is equal to its mass energy with E=mc^2? Shouldn't it have some energy left over to excite the electromagnetic field? The mass energy excites the Higgs field, so why is there no energy for the EM field?

The field E around an electron (or any charged particle) has energy proportional to E^2. It's thought this energy actually contributes to the rest mass of the electron. But it will never lose any of that energy to excite some other field.
 
... the self-energy of the electron, handled through renormalization.
It's kinda tricky to figure how best to answer this question since it seems to combine pop science descriptions.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top