Engineering Do not understand Solution to this problem (AC Circuit Analysis)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around confusion regarding equations in an AC circuit analysis problem, with the user expressing uncertainty about the source of these equations and their relevance to prior coursework. Key points include the mention of normalization constants from Fourier analysis and the use of "X" to denote resistance, which is clarified as reactance. The response suggests that the equations might relate to inductive smoothing in a bridge rectifier context and encourages consulting textbooks or classmates for further clarification. The user is seeking help to understand the logic behind the equations and their application. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges faced when encountering unfamiliar concepts in advanced circuit analysis.
Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


See The attached Images.

2. The attempt at a solution

The problem I am having with this is the following.

I do not know where he is getting these equations from. We haven't done anything like this in class. Although he keeps mentioning skills we learned in previous courses, which I took at another institution so it wasn't all exactly the same.

I see what looks like normalization constants from Fourier analysis? (2/pi) And square roots of 2 (usually indicates RMS). But I do not know the logic behind the equation. Also, why is he using "X" to indicate resistance? Is it a reactance? I also don't know where he gets the expression for the phase "u."

Sorry I know this might seem like a silly question but if anyone can help me out I would really appreciate it!
 

Attachments

  • ppp1.png
    ppp1.png
    30.1 KB · Views: 504
  • ppp2.png
    ppp2.png
    53.5 KB · Views: 529
Physics news on Phys.org
Xyius said:

Homework Statement


See The attached Images.

2. The attempt at a solution

The problem I am having with this is the following.

I do not know where he is getting these equations from. We haven't done anything like this in class. Although he keeps mentioning skills we learned in previous courses, which I took at another institution so it wasn't all exactly the same.

I see what looks like normalization constants from Fourier analysis? (2/pi) And square roots of 2 (usually indicates RMS). But I do not know the logic behind the equation. Also, why is he using "X" to indicate resistance? Is it a reactance? I also don't know where he gets the expression for the phase "u."

Sorry I know this might seem like a silly question but if anyone can help me out I would really appreciate it!

X is the universal symbol of reactance: Z = R + jX. X = wL for inductor and -1/wC for capacitor. X is in Ohms.

I can't make out the text in the 1st (your work) slide.
 
It looks like this might be using design approximations used for inductive smoothing at the output of a bridge rectifier. The flattened current waveform suggests you can assume very effective smoothing. That constant current indicates why you can represent the load as a fixed voltage source: a steady current into a fixed load is just like a fixed voltage in opposition.

The topic may be discussed in your textbook, otherwise search for worked examples online.
 
Last edited:
The handwriting is very clear and easy to read on my tablet, anyway.
 
I do not know where he is getting these equations from. We haven't done anything like this in class. Although he keeps mentioning skills we learned in previous courses, which I took at another institution so it wasn't all exactly the same.
Have you asked others in the class about these formulae? In any subject, your best resource is always other students in your class.
 
NascentOxygen said:
The handwriting is very clear and easy to read on my tablet, anyway.
So's mine. I was referring to the printed text.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top