Does integration give area between graph and x axis?

CAH
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Does integrating find the area between the curve and x-axis (regarless of it being a smile/frown or any other graph)?
I've heard people say its the area UNDER a curve...
but then how would you even get a definit answer surely it may be infinite if there's no restrictions?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
When people call it the area "under a curve", there is still the implicit assumption that it is above the x axis.

For a definite integral from a to b, you would be calculating the area of a region bounded as follows:

On the left by the vertical line defined by x=a
On the right by the vertical line defined by x=b
On the bottom by the horizontal line defined by y=0
On the top by the graph of the function.
 
Note that if the curve is below the x-axis then this area is counted with a minus sign
 
If it's below the x-axis is it calculating the area above the curve, between the curve and the x-axis above it
 
As jk22 pointed out, the areas of any regions where the graph is below the x-axis count as subtractions from the total area, not as additions. If the entire graph is below the x-axis then the entire area will be counted as negative.

But yes, other than this concern about the sign of the result, it is calculating the area above the graph and below the x axis.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top