Does internal resistance affect balance point?

AI Thread Summary
Changing the internal resistance of the driver cell in a potentiometer does affect the balance point, as it alters the potential drop across the wire AB. The balance point shifts because the potential gradient is influenced by the internal resistance of the driver cell. Some solutions incorrectly state that the balance point remains unchanged, likely due to a misunderstanding of the potentiometer's operation as a null method device. When the unknown emf is disconnected, adjusting the driver cell's resistance demonstrates that the voltage across the wire can vary. Ultimately, the balance point will be affected by changes in the internal resistance of the driver cell.
jonny23
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if a potentiometer has driver cell and wire AB ,then an unknown emf (emf<driver cell) is balanced at some length L. does the balance point change if internal resistance of driver cell is changed?

Homework Equations



V= kl K= potential gradient

The Attempt at a Solution


if we increase the internal resistance ,the potential drop across wire AB should decrease and so balance point must shift.. But the solution says it will not change.

Untitled.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonny23 said:

Homework Statement


if a potentiometer has driver cell and wire AB ,then an unknown emf (emf<driver cell) is balanced at some length L. does the balance point change if internal resistance of driver cell is changed?

Homework Equations



V= kl K= potential gradient

The Attempt at a Solution


if we increase the internal resistance ,the potential drop across wire AB should decrease and so balance point must shift.. But the solution says it will not change.

You are right, the balance point will shift if you change the internal resistance of the driver cell. It will not depend on the internal resistance of the unknown cell
.
 
ehild said:
the balance point will shift if you change the internal resistance of the driver cell.

But in solution( i have checked in 4 books) says it will not change since we have set constant potential gradient across the wire.. and i don't even understand it
 
It is wrong. The potential gradient across the wire is E/(ri+Rwire), where ri is the internal resistance of the driving source. Book solutions are wrong quite often. They certainly thought of the internal resistance of the measured cell.
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189 and jonny23
Well the solution to it is simple i guess because potentiometer is null method device i.e it does not draw any current from the cell and thus there is no potential drop due to internal resistance of the cell
 
nipun_59 said:
Well the solution to it is simple i guess because potentiometer is null method device i.e it does not draw any current from the cell and thus there is no potential drop due to internal resistance of the cell
Which cell do you talk about?
 
nipun_59 said:
Well the solution to it is simple i guess because potentiometer is null method device i.e it does not draw any current from the cell and thus there is no potential drop due to internal resistance of the cell
Sounds confusing.
Disconnect the unknown emf for a minute. Then the voltage across L is variable by varying the driver cell resistance, obviously. So adjust the driver cell to equal the unknown emf. When you reconnect the unknown emf there will be zero G current since the two voltages are the same. Disconnect the unknown emf again and readjust the driver cell resistance, then reconnect the unknown emf. Is the G current still zero?

Think of connecting two batteries of exactly equal voltage, + to +, - to -. No current, right? But take two batteries of dissimilar voltages and what happens?
 
Back
Top