Does the Coefficient of Static Friction Remain Constant Regardless of Mass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesyboy1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Surfaces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the experiment on the coefficient of static friction on an inclined plane, where the user found that the coefficient varied with mass, contrary to the expectation that it remains constant. The user plotted the coefficient against mass and noted that the graph was not horizontal, indicating a change in the coefficient. They questioned whether further analysis was necessary since their results did not support the hypothesis that the coefficient is independent of mass. It was clarified that the relationship being plotted was actually between the tangent of the angle and mass, not the coefficient directly. Ultimately, the user sought guidance on whether to continue processing data or conclude based on their findings.
jamesyboy1990
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



hi, i am almost done my lab on the coefficient of friction on an inclined plane. I was attempting to prove that the coefficent of static friction would be the same no matter the weight of the mass that was static on the incline. However, i plotted a coefficient versus mass graph, and the line wasn't horizontal (the coefficient changed). My quick question was whether i still need to find the equation for finding the coefficient based on my results, or if i could just conclude that in my case, the coefficient didn't stay constant, and then move to my conclusion

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
How did you calculate the coefficient of friction for your results?
 
i had an incline, measured the weight of the mass, and changed the angle such that if i increased the angle by a little bit, the mass would slide. I did this for several different masses and recorded the angle. I then used a freebody diagram and the equation for static friciton (u = Fmax/R)
 
And how did you calculate the normal reaction force?
 
R = mg cosx
F = mg sinx

so in essence, the coefficient was tanx
 
technically, all i need to know is whether i would have to process the graph to find a relation between weight and the coefficient (although i know that technicallly the coefficient is independant of mass) if all i wanted to prove in the lab was that the coefficient was independant of mass (and in my case, my experimental data didn't prove it)
 
Your not actually plotting \mu vs. m what your actually plotting is \tan\theta vs. m since;

\mu = \frac{F}{R} = \frac{mg\sin\theta}{mg\cos\theta} = \tan\theta
 
Last edited:
but since tanx = u, so why should it matter whether you plot u vs. m or tanx vs m?
 
jamesyboy1990 said:
but since tanx = u, so why should it matter whether you plot u vs. m or tanx vs m?
Indeed, \tan\theta = \mu, but are you keeping the angle constant?
 
  • #10
no, because the greater mass wouldn't stay static at the certain angle, so it would decrease.

if i am trying to prove that the coefficient should stay the same, and it doesn't in my experiment, do i have to do more, or can i just stop once the graph shows that the coefficient changed?
 
  • #11
i thought that: Frict max=mu R
so for your experiments to prove mu is irrespective of mass the particle has to be on the point of slipping
that may be too simple i am only doing as physics and you guys might be talking about something higher tho from mechanics mu is >= to R/Frict max
(sorry about symbols ect)
 
  • #12
honestly, the only question i wanted answered was in respect to the set up to the lab. Once you process enough data to prove/disprove the purpose of the lab, do you have to do any more processing, or can you just go straight to conclusion/evaluation?
 
Back
Top