Does the regular GRE matter for physics?

AI Thread Summary
Studying for the physics GRE is prioritized over the regular GRE, with concerns about the relevance of the regular GRE content, particularly historical dates. Graduate schools do consider regular GRE scores, primarily as a factor that can lead to rejection rather than acceptance. A strong performance on the physics GRE does not compensate for a significantly lower score on the regular GRE. While other application components matter, a low regular GRE score can negatively impact admission chances, especially when compared to other candidates with higher scores. It's advised not to neglect regular GRE preparation entirely to avoid potential drawbacks in the application process.
dipole
Messages
553
Reaction score
151
I plan to begin studying for the physics GRE no later than the beginning of August, but I hardly have any plans on studying for the regular GRE. After three years of physics I really can't imagine memorizing history dates and whatever other crap is on the regular GRE.

Do grad schools really look at your regular GRE scores and use them to reject people?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dipole said:
I plan to begin studying for the physics GRE no later than the beginning of August, but I hardly have any plans on studying for the regular GRE. After three years of physics I really can't imagine memorizing history dates and whatever other crap is on the regular GRE.

Do grad schools really look at your regular GRE scores and use them to reject people?

Good gre scores won't get you in but bad ones will keep you out of grad school. Also, the gre doesn't test you on historical dates.
 
Don't completely bomb it.
 
Let's say you get in the 90th percentile on the Physics GRE but the 50th on the regular GRE. You apply to X grad school. Another person who also is in the 90th percentile in Physics but is in the 60th percentile on the regular GRE also applies to X grad school.

Who does the grad school choose?

Obviously there are other factors but getting a low score on something that they actually look at isn't usually a good idea.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top