Doppler effect and hydrogen alpha distributions

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the Doppler effect in relation to hydrogen alpha distributions from a rotating planet or galaxy. Participants express confusion regarding the question's clarity, particularly whether it pertains to emissions from stars or gas clouds. It is noted that if considering the galaxy as a whole, the contributions from regions moving towards and away from the observer would lead to a symmetric widening in the spectrum. The assumption of an even distribution across all wavelengths is challenged, as the varying speeds of stars and gas clouds create blue and red shifts. Ultimately, the complexity of the galaxy's dynamics complicates the expected uniformity of the spectral distribution.
aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PhysicsASOE2014solutions.pdf
q14 b) i)
Relevant Equations
n/a
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PhysicsASOE2014solutions.pdf

q 14b) i)

Assuming that the planet is rotating at a constant rate, shouldn't the distribution be even across all wavelengths, or do I have something very wrong with my model.
I take the graph as the summation of rays from points on a planet which rotates. Each point similarly rotates and causes an equal amount of each wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aspodkfpo said:
Assuming that the planet is rotating at a constant rate, shouldn't the distribution be even across all wavelengths, or do I have something very wrong with my model.
I take the graph as the summation of rays from points on a planet which rotates. Each point similarly rotates and causes an equal amount of each wavelength.
Planet? Am I looking at the right question?
The question is poorly explained. I see no mention of gas until we come to the solution, so the student will naturally think these emissions are from the stars. Neither is it clear whether we are concerned with the spectrum from some specific part of the galaxy or from the galaxy as a whole. The mention of "fast rotating" region makes it sound like the former, but I think they want the expected spectrum for the galaxy as a whole when taking into account the contributions from the fast regions.
This is important because if it is for the whole galaxy then we have both fast towards us and fast away from us, leading to the symmetric widening in the answer graph.

Does that answer your question?
 
haruspex said:
Planet? Am I looking at the right question?
The question is poorly explained. I see no mention of gas until we come to the solution, so the student will naturally think these emissions are from the stars. Neither is it clear whether we are concerned with the spectrum from some specific part of the galaxy or from the galaxy as a whole. The mention of "fast rotating" region makes it sound like the former, but I think they want the expected spectrum for the galaxy as a whole when taking into account the contributions from the fast regions.
This is important because if it is for the whole galaxy then we have both fast towards us and fast away from us, leading to the symmetric widening in the answer graph.

Does that answer your question?
nope, I don't see why it wouldn't be the same % for each wavelength, i.e. straight line distribution.
 
aspodkfpo said:
nope, I don't see why it wouldn't be the same % for each wavelength, i.e. straight line distribution.
On one side of the galaxy you have stars and hot gas clouds rushing towards you (relative to the galaxy as a whole) at great speed, giving a blue shift, while on the other side they are are rushing away. I'm not sure which regions move fastest... if it is like planets around a star, the ones nearest the galactic centre will give the greatest shift.
But there's a limit to how fast they can go, and relatively few can be near the centre, so most of the shifts will be modest.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
981
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
12K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K