Doppler effect and hydrogen alpha distributions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the interpretation of the Doppler effect in relation to hydrogen alpha distributions from a rotating planet or galaxy. Participants express confusion regarding the question's clarity, particularly whether it pertains to emissions from stars or gas clouds. It is noted that if considering the galaxy as a whole, the contributions from regions moving towards and away from the observer would lead to a symmetric widening in the spectrum. The assumption of an even distribution across all wavelengths is challenged, as the varying speeds of stars and gas clouds create blue and red shifts. Ultimately, the complexity of the galaxy's dynamics complicates the expected uniformity of the spectral distribution.
aspodkfpo
Messages
148
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PhysicsASOE2014solutions.pdf
q14 b) i)
Relevant Equations
n/a
https://www.asi.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PhysicsASOE2014solutions.pdf

q 14b) i)

Assuming that the planet is rotating at a constant rate, shouldn't the distribution be even across all wavelengths, or do I have something very wrong with my model.
I take the graph as the summation of rays from points on a planet which rotates. Each point similarly rotates and causes an equal amount of each wavelength.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aspodkfpo said:
Assuming that the planet is rotating at a constant rate, shouldn't the distribution be even across all wavelengths, or do I have something very wrong with my model.
I take the graph as the summation of rays from points on a planet which rotates. Each point similarly rotates and causes an equal amount of each wavelength.
Planet? Am I looking at the right question?
The question is poorly explained. I see no mention of gas until we come to the solution, so the student will naturally think these emissions are from the stars. Neither is it clear whether we are concerned with the spectrum from some specific part of the galaxy or from the galaxy as a whole. The mention of "fast rotating" region makes it sound like the former, but I think they want the expected spectrum for the galaxy as a whole when taking into account the contributions from the fast regions.
This is important because if it is for the whole galaxy then we have both fast towards us and fast away from us, leading to the symmetric widening in the answer graph.

Does that answer your question?
 
haruspex said:
Planet? Am I looking at the right question?
The question is poorly explained. I see no mention of gas until we come to the solution, so the student will naturally think these emissions are from the stars. Neither is it clear whether we are concerned with the spectrum from some specific part of the galaxy or from the galaxy as a whole. The mention of "fast rotating" region makes it sound like the former, but I think they want the expected spectrum for the galaxy as a whole when taking into account the contributions from the fast regions.
This is important because if it is for the whole galaxy then we have both fast towards us and fast away from us, leading to the symmetric widening in the answer graph.

Does that answer your question?
nope, I don't see why it wouldn't be the same % for each wavelength, i.e. straight line distribution.
 
aspodkfpo said:
nope, I don't see why it wouldn't be the same % for each wavelength, i.e. straight line distribution.
On one side of the galaxy you have stars and hot gas clouds rushing towards you (relative to the galaxy as a whole) at great speed, giving a blue shift, while on the other side they are are rushing away. I'm not sure which regions move fastest... if it is like planets around a star, the ones nearest the galactic centre will give the greatest shift.
But there's a limit to how fast they can go, and relatively few can be near the centre, so most of the shifts will be modest.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top