Double Pendulum Problem - Lagrangian

Nusc
Messages
752
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Rather than solve the double pendulum problem with two masses in the usual way.

Instead express the coordinates of the second mass, in terms of the coordinates of the mass above it.

<br /> $ x2=x_1+\xi = L_1Sin[\theta]Cos[\phi]+L_2Sin[\alpha]Cos[\beta]$\\<br /> $ y2=y_1+ \eta = L_1Sin[\theta]Sin[\phi]+L_2Sin[\alpha]Sin[\beta]$\\<br /> $ z2=z_1-\xi = L_1-L_1Cos[\theta]-L_2Sin[\alpha]Cos[\beta]$<br />Wouldn't you suspect that the Lagrangian remain invariant? Is there a way to reparameterize these equations?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.jpg
    Picture 1.jpg
    32.4 KB · Views: 599
Physics news on Phys.org


No one has any opinions?

Does anyone know what I'm talking about?
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0990.jpg
    DSCN0990.jpg
    10.9 KB · Views: 587
  • DSCN0991.jpg
    DSCN0991.jpg
    26.9 KB · Views: 538
  • DSCN0992.jpg
    DSCN0992.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 573
Last edited:


Then the problem I'm interested in is the following
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0994.jpg
    DSCN0994.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 579
  • DSCN0993.jpg
    DSCN0993.jpg
    27.7 KB · Views: 521

Attachments

  • Picture 1.jpg
    Picture 1.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 531
Last edited:


I'm not sure if I had defined z_2 correct:
<br /> <br /> <br /> $ z2=z_1-\xi = L_1-L_1Cos[\theta]-L_2Cos[\alpha]$<br /> <br />
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top