Double Slits - Measuring Wavelength from the number of bright fringes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of light using a double-slit interference pattern. Given slits 0.3mm apart and a distance of 1.65cm spanning ten bright fringes, the wavelength is derived using the formula (m+1/2)λ = d(x/L). There is confusion regarding the use of 'm' for bright versus dark fringes, with clarification that (m+1/2) is indeed for dark fringes. The correct approach involves using m=9 for ten bright fringes and the total distance of 1.65cm to find the wavelength. The final calculation yields a wavelength of approximately 5.5E-7m.
Glorzifen
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A double-slit interference pattern is observed on a screen 1.0m behind two slits placed on 0.3mm apart. Ten bright fringes span a distance of 1.65cm. What is the wavelength of the light?

Homework Equations


Since we're looking at bright fringes:
(m+1/2)\lambda = dsin\theta = d(x/L)

The Attempt at a Solution


d = 3E-4m
m = 4 (I feel like I'm supposed to use just one half of the bands, excluding the middle band. Is this right? Why do I do this?)
L = 1.0m
y = 8.25E-3m (this is the spread of the 10 fringes divided by 2 since I'm using half of them)

(m+1/2)\lambda = d(x/L)
(4+1/2)\lambda = 3E-4(8.25E-3/1.0)
\lambda = 5.5E-7m

On my formula sheet there is an 'x'...the variable for the spread of the fringes is traditionally 'y'...I figured they were just the same thing so used y for x in the above example. If that's wrong then could someone explain where I get 'x' from? Any explanation would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just realized that (m+1/2) is for DARK fringes. Would that be correct for dark fringes at least?
 
If you use m=4 that is 4+4+1 which only gives you 9 fringes. The question doesn't say these are all the possible fringes, maybe only a part of all fringes. What I would do is use m= 9 (that is 10 because we include m=0) and use distance y as 1.65cm. And yes you are supposed to use (m)LaTeX Code: \\lambda
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top