Double Slits - Measuring Wavelength from the number of bright fringes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the wavelength of light using a double-slit interference pattern. Given slits 0.3mm apart and a distance of 1.65cm spanning ten bright fringes, the wavelength is derived using the formula (m+1/2)λ = d(x/L). There is confusion regarding the use of 'm' for bright versus dark fringes, with clarification that (m+1/2) is indeed for dark fringes. The correct approach involves using m=9 for ten bright fringes and the total distance of 1.65cm to find the wavelength. The final calculation yields a wavelength of approximately 5.5E-7m.
Glorzifen
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A double-slit interference pattern is observed on a screen 1.0m behind two slits placed on 0.3mm apart. Ten bright fringes span a distance of 1.65cm. What is the wavelength of the light?

Homework Equations


Since we're looking at bright fringes:
(m+1/2)\lambda = dsin\theta = d(x/L)

The Attempt at a Solution


d = 3E-4m
m = 4 (I feel like I'm supposed to use just one half of the bands, excluding the middle band. Is this right? Why do I do this?)
L = 1.0m
y = 8.25E-3m (this is the spread of the 10 fringes divided by 2 since I'm using half of them)

(m+1/2)\lambda = d(x/L)
(4+1/2)\lambda = 3E-4(8.25E-3/1.0)
\lambda = 5.5E-7m

On my formula sheet there is an 'x'...the variable for the spread of the fringes is traditionally 'y'...I figured they were just the same thing so used y for x in the above example. If that's wrong then could someone explain where I get 'x' from? Any explanation would be appreciated.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just realized that (m+1/2) is for DARK fringes. Would that be correct for dark fringes at least?
 
If you use m=4 that is 4+4+1 which only gives you 9 fringes. The question doesn't say these are all the possible fringes, maybe only a part of all fringes. What I would do is use m= 9 (that is 10 because we include m=0) and use distance y as 1.65cm. And yes you are supposed to use (m)LaTeX Code: \\lambda
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top