Drawing a free body diagram problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around drawing a free-body diagram for a 4.80 kg bucket of water being accelerated upward by a cord with a breaking strength of 86.0 N. The weight of the bucket is calculated to be 47.04 N, and participants clarify that the tension vector should be longer than the weight vector in the diagram. The breaking strength of 86 N is noted as relevant for determining the maximum upward acceleration before the cord fails. Participants confirm the correct application of Newton's second law, emphasizing the need to use the correct mass of the bucket in calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately representing forces in the free-body diagram.
Chandasouk
Messages
163
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.80 kg bucket of water is accelerated upward by a cord of negligible mass whose breaking strength is 86.0 N.

Draw the free-body force diagram for the bucket.
Draw the force vectors with their tails at the dot. The orientation of your vectors will be graded. The exact length of your vectors will not be graded but the relative length of one to the other will be graded.


Okay, I calculated the weight of the bucket of water which is w = -47.04N . If I were to make a free body diagram, the vector of w would be smaller than that of the Tension correct? Am I supposed to do something with the 86 N they gave me?

\SigmaFy = 86N + -47.04N = 38.96N

In this case, the vector of w would be longer than that of tension?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, the weight vector should be shorter than the tension vector. I don't know why they give you 86N breaking point, unless there is more to the problem? It is not required to analyze the situation qualitatively.

Is there another part that asks you to find the maximum upward acceleration before the rope breaks?
 
Last edited:
Oh, wow, yeah. It says

Apply Newton's second law to the bucket and find the maximum upward acceleration that can be given to the bucket without breaking the cord.


I didn't see it until I scrolled down.

I know I have to use F=ma, but would I do

38.96N=18kg*a ?
 
Haha nice.

You know that the force of gravity is 47.04N downwards and the maximum tension force is 86N. Because the initial 47.04N is required to counter gravity, the rest of that 86N causes your upward acceleration. You calculated 38.96N correctly, just remember that the mass of the bucket is 4.8kg not 18kg.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top