Drawing equipotential lines and field lines

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on drawing electric field lines and equipotential lines for a parallel plate configuration, with one plate at a positive potential and the other grounded. Participants confirm that electric field lines are perpendicular to equipotential lines and discuss the accuracy of the drawn representations. One user suggests that near the conducting surface, the electric field should bend more sharply, while another user inquires about drawing these lines for an off-center circle configuration. They express uncertainty about their methods and seek advice on automating the drawing process. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the relationship between electric fields and equipotential lines in electrostatics.
tmilford
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Draw the electric field lines and equipotential lines for the electrode configure. Assume one of the parallel plate is at a positive potential and the other one is grounded.

Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



I know the electric field lines and equipotential lines are perpendicular. I drew the lines but am not 100% sure it's correct. I mainly have problems with the equipotential lines

Here's the original picture

http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc394/alliereid1/original.png

And this is my attempt. The purple lines are the equipotential lines and the left side is positive, and black lines are the electric field lines

http://i1209.photobucket.com/albums/cc394/alliereid1/equipotential.png

It'd be great if someone could look it over to see if I'm on the right track. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
here's my attempt
attachment.php?attachmentid=32656&stc=1&d=1298876151.png


red ones are equi. pot. surfaces and purple are field lines
 

Attachments

  • aa.png
    aa.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 3,309
I like tmilford's better actually...

Close to the surface of a plate, the E-field should remain about parallel, but as you get closer to the conducting surface, the E-field bends more sharply toward its center.

The E-field at any point between the plate and the conducting surface = E_plate+E_surface (Vector Sum). The E_plate is constant for all space. The E_surface could be modeled as a dipole centered at the center of the surface with aggregate negative charge half-a-radius to the left and aggregate positive charge half-a-radius to the right along the central line. If you consider that only one end of the dipole primarily interacts with the region near its plate, then it looks like a point charge. Then points equidistant from the plate but farther away from the "aggregate charge position" have a less pronounced E-field in the direction of the center of the surface.

Also, the lines should not enter the material parallel to the horizontal central line because close to the surface of the conductor, they would point toward the "aggregate charge position."

Though I may have convoluted that explanation, that's my conceptual two-cents. I like tmilford's diagram better.
 
hey guys, don't mean to hijack this post, but how would i go about drawying equipotential and field lines for a small circle within a large one, off centre, toward the edge? is there a program to automate this?
i thought of drawing a square outside each of the circles and drawing a line from each corner, then rubbing out those squares and the result is something that looks right, although I'm not quite sure. any help?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top