.Drawing Ray Diagrams: Tips & Tricks for Solving Problems

  • Thread starter Thread starter GingerBread27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diagrams Ray Tips
AI Thread Summary
Drawing ray diagrams can be challenging, especially for lab assignments involving lenses. To accurately depict the image formed by a converging lens, three principal rays should be drawn from the object, allowing for the determination of the image's characteristics, such as whether it is real or virtual and its orientation. The focal length of the lens is crucial; it indicates how the lens converges light, with a positive image distance indicating the image is on the right side of the lens and a negative distance indicating it is virtual and on the left. The lens equation can be used to find the image distance, and understanding the sign conventions is essential for correct interpretation. Mastering these concepts will enhance the ability to solve problems involving ray diagrams effectively.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
I'm having a lot of trouble drawing ray diagrams (this is for a lab assignment). If anyone could give me some tips or links to websites that are helpful in teaching how to draw ray diagrams that would be great. One example of a problem is: A 1-cm tall arrow (the object) is placed 2 cm to the left of a converging lens having a 7 cm focal length. Show all three pricipal rays. Is the image real/virtual?Erect of inverted? Measuring from diagram determine the location and magnification of the image.

Now I think that I draw an upright arrow, 1 cm tall, to the left of the lens and then 7 cm to the right of the lens i draw another arrow? Is it upside down, larger/smaller? I have no idea what I'm doing and the write up for the lab is not helpful. Please help! thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You draw the three principle rays emanating from the tip of the 1-cm arrow you drew (which is your object). If you draw them correctly, they will meet at the point where the image of that arrow tip is. You'll be able to tell whether the image is real, inverted, magnified, just by looking at your (carefully drawn) diagram.

Here's a site that tells you how to draw those rays: http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/gbssci/phys/Class/refrn/u14l5da.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
For the problem I posted above would it be correct to do:

(1/do)+(1/di)=(1/f)=== (1/2)+(1/di)=(1/7), to get a di=-14/5=-2.8 cm, putting the image at 2.8 cm to the right of the lens?
Or am I completely clueless as to what focal length truly means, I thought it meant that the image was 7 cm from the lens.
 
Or am I completely clueless as to what focal length truly means, I thought it meant that the image was 7 cm from the lens.

No, that's not what it means. The focal length is the property of the lens itself.

to get a di=-14/5=-2.8 cm, putting the image at 2.8 cm to the right of the lens?

Notice that d_i is negative. This means that the image is virtual. So, the image is to the left of the lens.
 
GingerBread27 said:
For the problem I posted above would it be correct to do:

(1/do)+(1/di)=(1/f)=== (1/2)+(1/di)=(1/7), to get a di=-14/5=-2.8 cm, putting the image at 2.8 cm to the right of the lens?
Your use of the lens equation is correct, but your interpretation of the minus sign is not. (See Berislav's comments.) The sign convention says that a positive image distance is to the right of the lens; a negative image distance, to the left.

Or am I completely clueless as to what focal length truly means, I thought it meant that the image was 7 cm from the lens.
A focal length of 7cm means that parallel rays will be focused at the focal point, which is 7cm past the lens; it describes how much the lens converges (or diverges) the light that goes through it. (The shorter the focal length, the more powerful the lens.) Where the image is formed depends on (1) where you put the object and (2) the focal length of the lens. To find where the image is, use the lens equation (just as you did).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top