Dynamics problem: Rod on a rough surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving a uniform rod on a rough surface, where participants are attempting to calculate the work done by friction as the rod moves out of the rough region. One participant proposes a solution that integrates the frictional force over the length of the rod, resulting in a work value of kMgL²/6. Another participant challenges this by arguing that the force acting on different parts of the rod varies, leading to a different calculation that yields kMgL²/3. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly accounting for the changing forces on each segment of the rod during its displacement. Ultimately, the participants seek clarification on their approaches to ensure accurate results.
Ak94
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Not exactly homework, but this is a problem that a guy posed me.. and we seem to be getting different answers. I'm not entirely sure where either of us is going wrong.

Homework Statement
A uniform rod of mass M and length L lies on the x-axis, with its ends at x = 0 and x = L. A varying force of magnitude F is pulling the rod in the right direction, such that the rod is moving with constant velocity. The floor beneath the rod is rough only in the region from x = 0 to x = L, with the coefficient of friction between the rod and floor being 'kx', where k is a constant and x is the x-coordinate of the point. Find the magnitude of the work done by the frictional force in moving the entire rod out of the rough region.

The attempt at a solution
Here's what I came up with:
I take a length 'dx' of the rod at a distance 'x' from the origin. Its mass is (M/L)dx, force on it [(M/L)dx * gkx], and work done by friction on it [(M/L)dx * gkx * (L-x)]. I integrate x from 0 to L to get \frac{kMgL^{2}}{6}.

A person who gave me the question has this solution:
At an instant, let the left end of the rod have an x-coordinate "y". Consider a part of the rod with coordinate "x" of length dx. Force on it:\int \frac{Mgkx(dx)}{L} from "y" to "L". Then dW = (That integral) * dy, and he then integrates from 0 to L to get \frac{kMgL^{2}}{3}.

I think his solution is wrong because he's assumed a constant force to be displacing the entire rod by "dy" to get "dW", which won't make sense because different forces are acting on each part of the rod. I'm not fully confident about my own solution either, so it'd be helpful if someone could clarify.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ak94 said:
The attempt at a solution
Here's what I came up with:
I take a length 'dx' of the rod at a distance 'x' from the origin. Its mass is (M/L)dx, force on it [(M/L)dx * gkx], and work done by friction on it [(M/L)dx * gkx * (L-x)].

The work you got is wrong. The force changes while a tiny piece of the rod moves from x to L. You can not use the same "dx" for the length of a piece and for the displacement of the same piece.
You have a piece of length δl situated at x=l initially. The work δW done by friction when the piece moves from x=l to x=L is
δ W= \int _l^L{(kMg\delta l/L) xdx}=(kMg\delta l/L)\frac{L^2-l^2}{2}

The total work is obtained by integrating for all pieces from l=0 to L.
W=(kMg/L)\int _0^L{\frac{L^2-l^2}{2}dl}

ehild
 
Great, thanks a lot, I knew I was going wrong somewhere.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top