Effect of electrical field on heat capacity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effect of an electrical field on the heat capacity of perfect gas molecules with a permanent electrical dipole moment. Participants are tasked with deriving the additional effect of the electrical field on heat capacity, starting from the potential energy expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the computation of the partition function and share their attempts at integrating the potential energy expression. There are questions regarding the limits of integration and the appropriate angular measures to use in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided hints and corrections regarding the integration process. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct form of the integral and the implications of the dipole's fixed length on the degrees of freedom in the calculations. While some participants express uncertainty, others indicate progress in their understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating in three dimensions and addressing the specifics of the potential energy function in the context of an external field. There is a focus on ensuring the correct angular dependencies are applied in the calculations.

Shadowz
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the perfect gas molecules with permanent electrical dipole moment u in the field \epsilon.
The potential energy is U = -u\epsilon\cos\Theta
Derive the additional effect of \epsilon on the heat capacity.

I need some hints, please help. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You have to compute the partition function first...do you know how to do that?
 
Hi,

So my attempt was to compute q = \int_0^{2\pi} e^{-\beta U} d\Theta

But this gives me the Bessel function, so I am not sure if I am on the right track.
 
Shadowz said:
Hi,

So my attempt was to compute q = \int_0^{2\pi} e^{-\beta U} d\Theta

But this gives me the Bessel function, so I am not sure if I am on the right track.
No because you are in 3D and the angular measure you have to use is
sin \theta d\phi d\theta and not just d\theta.
 
Hi,

Thank for your help. I agree.

So I tried

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi} e^{-\beta \mu \epsilon \cos\Phi}sin\Theta d\Theta d\Phi
but still gets the Bessel function.

Is my limit of integration wrong?

Should it be

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{-\beta \mu \epsilon \cos\Phi} r^2 drsin\Theta d\Theta d\Phi

Thanks,
 
Last edited:
Shadowz said:
Hi,

Thank for your help. I agree.

So I tried

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi} e^{-\beta \mu \epsilon \cos\Phi}sin\Theta d\Theta d\Phi
but still gets the Bessel function.

Is my limit of integration wrong?

Should it be

\int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^{\pi}\int_0^\infty e^{-\beta \mu \epsilon \cos\Phi} r^2 drsin\Theta d\Theta d\Phi

Thanks,
Well the thing is that you should have \cos \theta instead of \cos \phi in the exponential. The reason for that is that you have an external field which point toward a non varying direction. In spherical basis and coordinates the only vector that fulfill this criteria is \hat{u}_z whose scalar product with \hat{u}_r gives \cos \theta.
 
Thanks, I got it. So we won't need r^2dr in the integral. I get the result that has sinh in it.
 
Shadowz said:
Thanks, I got it. So we won't need r^2dr in the integral. I get the result that has sinh in it.
No you don't need the r^2dr part in the integral because your dipole has a fixed "length" and therefore its length shouldn't be taken as a degree of freedom.
I don't know exactly the result but a sinh sounds good to me.
 
Ya right. Thank you. The rest is easy, I think.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K