Effectiveness to calculate the outlet temperatures of a heat exchanger

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating outlet temperatures and heat transfer rates in a heat exchanger, specifically addressing the effectiveness of the system. Participants explore various equations and methods related to thermal dynamics, including the definitions of effectiveness and the configurations of heat exchangers.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants calculate outlet temperatures using effectiveness equations, with one participant arriving at 37.5°C for the hot fluid outlet.
  • Others express uncertainty about the definition of effectiveness (ε) and its application in their calculations.
  • There is a discussion about whether the heat exchanger is countercurrent or co-current, with some assuming countercurrent based on the problem context.
  • One participant calculates a heat transfer rate of 129 kW, while another questions the validity of a higher rate of 218 kW based on the configuration.
  • Some participants derive effectiveness values for different configurations, noting discrepancies in their calculations compared to provided values.
  • There are conflicting calculations for outlet temperatures, with one participant obtaining 66.25°C for the cold stream and 37.5°C for the hot stream, while another suggests different values based on their assumptions.
  • Participants discuss the correction factor and its calculation, with some expressing confusion over the equations used and the results obtained.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the definitions and applications of effectiveness, the configuration of the heat exchanger, or the correctness of their calculations. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various equations and definitions that may depend on specific assumptions or contexts, leading to different interpretations and results. The discussion highlights the complexity of heat exchanger calculations and the potential for confusion in applying theoretical concepts to practical problems.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals working on heat exchanger design and analysis, particularly those grappling with effectiveness calculations and thermal dynamics principles.

PCal
Messages
31
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
The data below relates to a specific heat exchanger. A reliable colleague has looked up an effectiveness chart and says that the effectiveness in the given operating conditions is 0.82.
For hot fluid: mass flowrate qm= 0.7 kg s -1, specific heat capacity cp=1.8 kJ kg-1 K-1, inlet temp= 140°C . For cold fluid: mass flowrate qm= 0.6 kg s -1, specific heat capacity cp=4.2 kJ kg-1 K-1, inlet temp= 15°C . Area of heat transfer surface=14m^2, Overall heat transfer coefficient 360 W m-2 K-1.
Determine:
i. the two outlet temperatures.
ii. the heat transfer rate.
I've spent ages on this but can't seem to find an equation to find both outlet temperatures! Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Relevant Equations
ε=(T_HI-T_H2)/(T_HI-T_C1 )
Because the specific heat capacity is lower for the hot fluid:
ε=(T_hi-T_h2)/(T_hi-T_C1 )

0.82=(140-T_h2)/(140-15)

140-T_h2= 102.5

T_h2= 140-102.5=37.5°

I'm not sure if I'm actually on the right track here, if I am this is as far as I've gotten. I can't seem to then find an equation to calculate T_c2 other than the equation which my lessons tell me is only used when the specific heat capacity is lower for the cold fluid.
 

Attachments

  • Question.jpg
    Question.jpg
    36 KB · Views: 770
Physics news on Phys.org
This is where I'm currently at
241395
 
PCal said:
In my lessons ε has been used to define effectiveness
My bad -- long time ago :sorry:

To make up: Got the same result as you did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PCal
BvU said:
My bad -- long time ago :sorry:

To make up: Got the same result as you did.
fab thank you!
 
241404
one more thing, how's this for the heat transfer rate please?
 
Is this a countercurrent heat exchanger or a co-current heat exchanger? I assume that it is countercurrent, correct?
 
Chestermiller said:
Is this a countercurrent heat exchanger or a co-current heat exchanger? I assume that it is countercurrent, correct?
The question doesn't actually specify, I've assumed it's countercurrent/ cross flow
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
Is this a countercurrent heat exchanger or a co-current heat exchanger? I assume that it is countercurrent, correct?
Part C of the question also refers to the correction factor which leads me to think it's cross flow
 
  • #11
PCal said:
one more thing, how's this for the heat transfer rate please?
In #1 you calculated 129 kW
##Q_{\rm max} ## = 157.2, so I find 218 kW hard to believe ...

The 218 comes from UA*LMTD which applies to a countercurrent heat exchanger. Here you have a less effective heat transfer configuration, so a higher LMTD and your expression isn't valid.
Must say the exercise composer doesn't make it easy for you. Good you did the UA*LMTD check -- I did it too and had to look more than twice :wink:
Chestermiller said:
Is this a countercurrent heat exchanger or a co-current heat exchanger? I assume that it is countercurrent, correct?
Hi Chet! I was kind of struggling with that too. With ##\ C_{\rm min} =1.26,\ ## and ##\ UA =5.04##, NTU = 4. C_r=0.5 so that ##\ \varepsilon## for co-current would be 0.66 and counter 0.93 with the 0.82 in between.
 
  • #12
BvU said:
In #1 you calculated 129 kW
##Q_{\rm max} ## = 157.2, so I find 218 kW hard to believe ...

The 218 comes from UA*LMTD which applies to a countercurrent heat exchanger. Here you have a less effective heat transfer configuration, so a higher LMTD and your expression isn't valid.
Must say the exercise composer doesn't make it easy for you. Good you did the UA*LMTD check -- I did it too and had to look more than twice :wink:Hi Chet! I was kind of struggling with that too. With ##\ C_{\rm min} =1.26,\ ## and ##\ UA =5.04##, NTU = 4. C_r=0.5 so that ##\ \varepsilon## for co-current would be 0.66 and counter 0.93 with the 0.82 in between.

Of course, I didn't click onto that! Does 129.5kW sound like a more believable heat transfer rate please? Apologies this modules taking a lot to get my head around!
 
  • #13
Yes. If I assume counterflow, I get outlet temperatures of 73 for the cold stream and 24.1 for the hot stream.
 
  • #14
PCal said:
Of course, I didn't click onto that! Does 129.5kW sound like a more believable heat transfer rate please? Apologies this modules taking a lot to get my head around!
The 129.15 follows from the given information, yes.
 
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
Yes. If I assume counterflow, I get outlet temperatures of 73 for the cold stream and 24.1 for the hot stream.
Sorry I'm so confused, I got 66.25 for the cold stream outlet and 37.5 for the hot, this seems way off the mark!
 
  • #16
PCal said:
Sorry I'm so confused, I got 66.25 for the cold stream outlet and 37.5 for the hot, this seems way off the mark!
My calculation was for countercurrent flow. If you check your numbers, the heat transfer rate based on the log mean temperature difference does not match the heat transfer rate based on the flows and heat capacities (if the flow were assume to be countercurrent).
 
  • #17
Ohh that makes sense thank you, I'll look back over my lesson and calculations.
 
  • #18
Chestermiller said:
My calculation was for countercurrent flow. If you check your numbers, the heat transfer rate based on the log mean temperature difference does not match the heat transfer rate based on the flows and heat capacities (if the flow were assume to be countercurrent).
Still completely baffled I'm afraid, it seems you've used 1-e^-ntu(1-c)/1-Ce^-ntu(1-c) to get effectiveness= 0.92 and used that in your equations. Going through the same equation I got the same answer, however my question states that the effectiveness is 0.82. Given that, my outputs of cold= 66.25 and hot=37.5 would be correct wouldn't they?
 
  • #19
PCal said:
Still completely baffled I'm afraid, it seems you've used 1-e^-ntu(1-c)/1-Ce^-ntu(1-c) to get effectiveness= 0.92 and used that in your equations. Going through the same equation I got the same answer, however my question states that the effectiveness is 0.82. Given that, my outputs of cold= 66.25 and hot=37.5 would be correct wouldn't they?
Yes. That would be correct. But it looks like their providing U and A in the problem statement is totally extraneous sine you never need to use it in solving this problem.

Incidentally, I didn't use the equation you referred to in solving the countercurrent results; I derived the results from scratch.
 
  • #20
Thank you, so using that I'd get a heat transfer rate of 129.15 kW? Given that, am I correct in thinking I'd then use ∆Tc=UA/Φ then F=∆Tc x LMTD to get the correction factor?
 
  • #21
PCal said:
Thank you, so using that I'd get a heat transfer rate of 129.15 kW? Given that, am I correct in thinking I'd then use ∆Tc=UA/Φ then F=∆Tc x LMTD to get the correction factor?
Sorry. I don't fully understand what you are saying. The 129.15 is correct for the problem as posed.
 
  • #22
Chestermiller said:
Sorry. I don't fully understand what you are saying. The 129.15 is correct for the problem as posed.
Sorry, the next part of the question asks...
241477

Would the equations I posted above prove this wrong please? I worked out that the correction factor=1.68 but have no idea if this is correct.
 
  • #23
PCal said:
Sorry, the next part of the question asks...
View attachment 241477
Would the equations I posted above prove this wrong please? I worked out that the correction factor=1.68 but have no idea if this is correct.
What is the reciprocal of 1.68?
 
  • #24
0.59! Why have I had to take the reciprocal though?
 
  • #25
Got it! I was doing F=∆Tc x LMTD as opposed to F=∆Tc/LMTD
Thank you for all your help!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #26
Hi, I am working this same question at the moment and I have got the same answers you did for the outlet temperatures and the heat transfer rate of TC2 = 66.25°C and TH2 = 37.5°C, and the transfer rate of 129.15kW.
I am now struggling with the correction factor part of the question. Following the equations given in the lessons which are as you mention above I am not getting to 0.59.

I get :
∆Tc = Φ / UA
129.15 / (0.36 x 14)
∆Tc = 25.625°C
Then

F=∆Tc/LMTD

LMTD = (TC2 - TC1) / In [(TH - TC1) / (TH - TC2)]
= (66.25 - 15) / In [(140 - 15) / (140 - 66.25)]
LMTD = 97.13°C

F=∆Tc/LMTD
25.625 / 97.13
F = 0.264
Please can someone point me in the right direction please as I am going round in circles.
Thanks in advance.
 
  • #27
I suspect your LMTD expression -- It looks wrong and it should have four temperatures as argument, not three

By the way, if you start a new thread, you appear on the 'unanswered' list (Threads with no replies) which is seen by many helpers. Now only the participants in this thread get a signal.
 
  • #28
The effectiveness factor is the ratio of the heat transfer rate to the maximum possible heat transfer rate. The maximum heat transfer rate is what you get if you have countercurrent flow. With countercurrent flow, you have different inlet and outlet temperatures than the ones given.
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K