Effects of an electric field on a motion of an electron

AI Thread Summary
An electron projected at an angle of 31.7° with a speed of 8.40×10^5 m/s in an electric field of E = 383j N/C was analyzed to determine the time to return to its initial height. The electric force was calculated using F=qE, leading to an acceleration of a=(q/m)E. The y-component of the velocity was found, and the time to reach maximum height was calculated using kinematic equations. Initially, the calculated time was incorrect due to a misidentified charge exponent. After correcting the exponent from -16 to -19, the method was confirmed to be correct, resolving the issue.
wendo
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electron is projected at an angle of 31.7° above the horizontal at a speed of 8.40×10^5 m/s in a region where the electric field is E = 383j N/C. Neglecting the effects of gravity, calculate the time it takes the electron to return to its initial height.

Homework Equations




I first found the electric force that the E field exerts on the electron by using F=qE.

Then I found the acceleration of the electron with a=(q/m)E

Thought perhaps electron would undergo motion similar to a projectile, so then first found the y component of the velocity sin 31.7=opp/8.40x10^5s.

Then applied vf=vi + at solving for t (with vf=0 because it will be when the electron has all potential energy at its highest point)


The Attempt at a Solution



F=383x(-1.6x10^-16C)
=-6.13x10^-14N

a=-6.13x10^-14N/9.11x10^-31kg (mass of electron)
=-6.73x10^16m/s^2

sin 31.7=opp/8.40x10^5m/s
opp= 4.41x10^5m/s

vf=vi +at
0=4.41 + -6.73x10^16m/s^2t
t=6.55x10^-12s (this would be the time to reach max height, so the amount of time to get back down to its initial height would be double this)

so t= 1.31x10^-11s
But this answer is not right... and I'm not show how else to relate t to an electric field. Can anyone point out what I'm doing wrong here??

Thanks SOOO much! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Uh, the exponent of the electron charge is -19, not -16. But there is nothing wrong with your method.
 
omg... wow... I can't that was all it was!

THANK YOUUU DICK! :D
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top