Effortlessly Evaluate Integral Involving Sec with Limits -pi/3 to 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the integral of \(2(\sec x)^3\) from \(-\frac{\pi}{3}\) to \(0\). The user expresses confusion regarding the integration process, particularly how to apply the substitution method with \(u = \sec x\) and \(v = \tan x\). The solution involves integrating by parts, resulting in \(2(\sec x \tan x) - 2 \int \sec x \tan^2 x \, dx\), and further evaluating the integral of \(\sec x\) and \(\sec x \tan^2 x\). The integration technique relies on the relationship between derivatives of the variables under the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically integration by parts
  • Familiarity with trigonometric identities, particularly secant and tangent functions
  • Knowledge of substitution methods in integration
  • Ability to evaluate definite integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the integration by parts technique in detail
  • Learn about trigonometric integrals, focusing on \(\sec x\) and \(\tan x\)
  • Explore the concept of substitution in integrals with various functions
  • Practice evaluating definite integrals involving trigonometric functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on integral calculus, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of trigonometric integrals and integration techniques.

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
evaluate

\int2(sec x)^3 with the limits as -pi/3 to 0

I tried all sorts of things from breaking it apart to substitution, but known of what I tried work.

The book shows setting u=sec x & v=tan x

Then it shows the first step as 2 (sec x tan x) - 2 \int(sec x) * (tan x)^2 dx then evaluate both parts to -pi/3 to 0.

Which is really what I'm not understanding. How did they integrate the first part & then still have the next part? I'm also not seeing how u & v come into play.

Guess I'm just plain lost on this one.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Substitution

As Griffith's puts it, paraphrased, you can move the derivative from one variable to the other under an integral, and you'll just pick up a minus sign and a boundary term.

Thus the equation:
\int_a^buv'dx=\left.uv\right|_a^b-\int_a^bu'vdx
 
\int\sec x(\tan^{2}x+1)dx
\int\sec x\tan^{2}xdx+\int\sec xdx

u=\sec x
du=\sec x \tan x dx

dV=\tan^{2}xdx
V=\sec x
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K