Egg Drop Ideas: Solve the Physics Puzzle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on creating a device to catch an egg dropped from 9.91 meters without breaking it, emphasizing the need to increase the drop time to reduce impact force. Suggestions include using materials like tissue paper or packing material to cushion the egg. Participants discuss relevant physics equations, correcting initial miscalculations of velocity and time. One effective idea proposed is using a bucket of water to absorb the impact, leveraging the water's surface area to minimize the egg's deceleration. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding forces, momentum, and the work required to design a successful egg drop apparatus.
Maddyk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need help with egg drop ideas! For this project, I have to create something that will catch an egg (about 62.5 g) dropped from a height of 9.91 meters so that it will not break or crack. I also have to discuss forces, impulses, momentum, time and velocity changes of the egg. I also have to calculate the work done by my device.

Homework Equations


p=mv
Ft=p2-p1
V=Vo+at
d=do+Vo+.5at
V^2=V(o)^2+2a(d-do)
W=Fd

The Attempt at a Solution


Well, for my contraption I know I need to increase the time the egg drops in order to decrease the force impacted on its shell. I was thinking of putting tissue paper in a box or even getting the tiny packing material and putting it in a box? I just wanted to know if anyone had any other solutions
As for solving for final velocity, I used V^2=V(o)^2+2a(d-do)=0+2(-9.8 m/s^2)(-9.91 meters)=194 m/s
I don't think that's right though…
As for the other equations, i can't solve for them until I decide what I will be making my apparatus from...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maddyk said:
I don't think that's right though…
It's not. You might want to check your "relevant equations" for starters.
 
Bystander said:
It's not. You might want to check your "relevant equations" for starters.
Okay. I went over my notes again, and i used d=vt+1/2at^2 to solve for t (t=(2d/g)^1/2) being that g=a=-9.8, and i got 1.42 s for the time. Would I be able to plug that time into the Vf=Vo+at equation (a=-9.8) to get final velocity? I did that and got -13.9 m/s
 
Much better.
 
To catch an egg? A bucket of water.
 
Hello Maddyk, and welcome to PF :smile: !

An egg is incredibly strong. Just try to squeeze one by applying manual pressure from all around (if you hand is big enough). No chance. But a prick with a pin will easily go through (*).

Here you can see eggs are strong enough to walk on.

Well, for my contraption I know I need to increase the time the egg drops in order to decrease the force impacted on its shell.
You mean you want to increase the time the egg decelerates from this 14 m/s down to 0 m/s. Douq's idea seems brilliant to me (*), but from your problem statement I conclude you have to do some more work. Like finding out how much deceleration an egg can withstand.

As for the amount of work: Actually your " V2=V(o)2+2a(d-do)=0+2(-9.8 m/s2)(-9.91 meters) " is correct. So at landing time you have V2=194 m2/s2 , which is not the same as V = 194 m/s.

Bystander's advice still deserves following up: go through your equations (dimensions too) and check if they are correct.​

If you understand where your V2 equation comes from, you'll know straightaway how much work your contraption has to do !
And since work can be used to lift a weight, perhaps you can even design your device to recover a nice fraction of the kinetic energy by letting the egg fall on an oversized cloth that is draped over the bucket with suitable weights hanging from the corners. See how far the weights can be lifted and check with mgh of the egg!

Have fun :smile: !

(*) [edit] I forgot: so the area that catches the egg is important, and with a water surface you are exploiting that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top