Elastic Collision using Special Relativity

sanjewierden
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was given the following problem and I an trying to discover if it can be answered by transforming to the center of mass frame and then transforming back.

"Consider a perfectly elastic collision between a particle moving with kinetic energy 10 times its rest mass energy and an identical particle at rest. After the collision the incident particle is moving in a direction 10 degrees deflected from its original path. Find the final kinetic energies of both particles and the angle of the path of the struck particle relative to the incident direction."

The Attempt at a Solution


I started using the relationship of the rest mass energy to show
KE= ρ^2/(2m) = ((γ^2)/2)*m*v^2
so 20= (γ^2)(β^2) thus, β=sqrt(20/21) and γ=sqrt(21)

then I used conservation of momentum and conservation of momentum to try and answer the question. I tried it using a transform to the center of mass frame but I want to be sure that this is even possible. I always get confused when doing these transformations as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi. Welcome to Physics Forums.

Isn't the kinetic energy given by KE=mc^2(\gamma -1), in which case γ=11?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top