Electric Current: Finding Energy lost in a capacitor

ilovenorman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



E& M
Purcell, 3.11

A 100-pF capacitor is charged to 100 volts. After the charging battery is disconnected, the capacitor is connected in parallel to another capacitor. If the final voltage is 30 volts, what is the capacitance of the second capacitor? How much energy was lost, and what happened to it?

Homework Equations



Q = 1/4pi times integral of E dA or the integral of σ dA

C = Q/phi not = a

σ = E/4pi = δ1 - δ2 / s4pi

capacitance of conductor: Q = C(δ1 - δ2)



The Attempt at a Solution



Using the known equations and values and keeping in mind that the plate is charged in parallel, I know that the energy stored in a capacitor is

U = 1/2 A/4pi(s) (Es)^2 or E^2/8pi * volume

The voltage difference is 100-30 = 70 volts, so we start to plug into find capacitance by denoting Q = 70, C = 70/phi. I don't really know how to find phi, or the energy afterwards, but I do know the energy equation. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phi is a voltage? Ok

Q = 70
That is wrong.
You can calculate Q with the capacity and known initial voltage.
This Q stays the same when the other capacitor is connected, this allows to find its capacity.

Energy loss can be calculated afterwards.

You don't need details about the capacitors, like volume, electric field and so on - they are irrelevant here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top