Electric Field and Charge Density

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating charge density from an electric field using Gauss's Law. The electric field intensity is given as E(x) = \hat{x} Kx^3, where K is a constant, and the charge density is assumed to be a volume charge density. The user seeks clarification on whether the charge density is constant and how to derive it using Gauss's Law. The solution involves integrating the charge density over the specified region and relating it to the electric field through the equation E(x) = Q_total/(Aε0). Ultimately, the charge density is expressed as ρ(x) = (E(x)ε0)/A, leading to the final formula ρ(x) = (Kx^3ε0)/(2a).
jesuslovesu
Messages
185
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Electric Field and Charge Density

Oops, nevermind I guess I just use div(E) = rho/e0

Homework Statement



A layer of charge fills the space between x = -a and x = a. The layer has a charge density \rho (x). The electric field intensity everywhere inside the charge distribution is given by E(x) = \hat{x} Kx^3 where K is a constant[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I asked my professor about this and he said the \rho(x) should be a volume charge density. So basically it's an infinite slab (in the y and z dir) Having some difficulty in finding the charge density.

I am assuming the charge density is NOT constant everywhere, correct?
I recognize that this requires a Gauss's Law formulation. Similar to an infinite plane if I am not mistaken.
E(A) = Qin/e0
E(2A) = \rho (x) * A * (2a)/e0
E = \rho (x) * a/e0
Can I just plug in E and rearrange to get \rho (x) ? Am I handling the ends correctly? I am basically following the same procedure for finding the E of an infinite plane except I am using 2a as the thickness.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SOLUTION:Yes, you can use Gauss's Law to solve this problem. First, we need to calculate the electric field at a given point x inside the charge distribution: E(x) = \hat{x} Kx^3Then, we can calculate the total charge inside the charge distribution by integrating the charge density over the region between x=-a and x=a: Q_{total} = \int_{-a}^{a} \rho(x) dxFinally, we can use Gauss's Law to relate the electric field and charge density: E(x) = \frac{Q_{total}}{A\epsilon_0}where A is the area of the charge distribution (in this case it is 2a). We can then rearrange this equation to solve for the charge density: \rho(x) = \frac{E(x)\epsilon_0}{A} = \frac{\hat{x}Kx^3\epsilon_0}{2a}
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top