Electric field at a point (point charge and semi-circle rod)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the electric fields at point C due to a uniformly charged semicircular rod and a negative point charge. It is suggested that the magnitude of the electric field from the point charge (Ep) is greater than that from the rod (Er), as the rod's charge can be treated as a series of point charges contributing to the overall field. The net electric field at point C is debated, with some arguing it equals Ep due to the alignment of electric field lines, while others emphasize that all segments of the rod contribute to the net field. Clarification is sought regarding the term "fractional charge," with suggestions that it refers to continuously distributed charge rather than a simple fraction of Q. The conversation concludes with a recommendation to derive an integral for the total electric field produced by the rod at point C.
AnonBae
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A thin semicircular rod has a total charge +Q uniformly distributed along it. A negative point charge -Q is placed as shown. (Point C is equidistant from -Q and from all points on the rod.)
*Image Attached*
Let Ep and Er represent the electric fields at point C due to the point charge and the rod respectively.

a) Is the magnitude of Ep greater than, less than, or equal to the magnitude of Er? Explain.

b) Is the magnitude of the net electric field at point C greater than, lessthan, or equal to the magnitude of Ep? Explain.

Homework Equations


ΣE = Fe / q

The Attempt at a Solution


a. I am guessing the magnitude of Ep is greater than the magnitude of Er since we can treat a segment charge on the rod as a point charge, and thus the by the equation, the electric field is dependent on the charge. The fractional charge on the rod will produce a greater electrical force than the point charge does.
b. The magnitude of the net electric field is equal to the magnitude at Ep since the point C lies on the electric field line between point C and the fractional charge on the rod.
 

Attachments

  • Charge and rod.PNG
    Charge and rod.PNG
    3.2 KB · Views: 1,121
Physics news on Phys.org
AnonBae said:
we can treat a segment charge on the rod as a point charge
In what sense, placed where, and of what magnitude?
AnonBae said:
The fractional charge on the rod
Why fractional?

For b, I don't think you are reading the question correctly.
 
a. I do know that a fractional charge of +Q contributes to the electric field at point C since no other electric field lines cross through point C besides the one horizontal to point C. I am confused as to whether that fractional charge offsets its weak electric force by the formula for the electric field or it does not.

b. So, the net electric field is contributed by all charges on the rod (total of +Q) and the sum of the electric field from all those charges will equal the electric field Ep since they both converge at the same point?
 
AnonBae said:
fractional charge of +Q contributes to the electric field at point C
I still don't know what you mean by a fractional charge here. Do you mean a continuously distributed charge? Or one infinitesimal element of the distributed charge? Or just some fraction less than 1 of Q?
AnonBae said:
no other electric field lines cross through point C besides the one horizontal to point C.
Except for the extreme ends, all parts of the rod generate a field which has a horizontal component at C.
Write an integral for the total field the rod produces at C.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top