Electric Field at Various Points Between Two Charged Rods

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field at three points between a positively charged rod (+10 nC) and a negatively charged rod (-10 nC), which are 4 cm apart. The user observed that the electric field strength at the midpoint (2 cm from the positive rod) was less than at the other two points (1 cm and 3 cm), which they found counterintuitive. They questioned whether this observation indicated a mistake in their calculations. The relevant formula for the electric field due to a charged rod was mentioned but not correctly formatted. Clarification on the behavior of electric fields in this configuration is sought.
Bogus_Roads
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two questions:

One problem asked me to calculate the Electrical Field at points 1 (1cm from the + rod),2 (2 cm from the positive rod), and 3 (3 cm from the positive rod) between a +10 nC rod and a -10 nC rod (in the middle in the vertical direction). I found that positions 1 and 3 were the same, which was whatki I expected, but I thought it was weird that the field in the very center (the rods are 4 cm apart), so at 2 cm from the positively charged rod, the field was LESS than in the other two positions. This seemed counterintuitive. Did I make a mistake?



Homework Equations



Erod=1/(4pi\epsilon0))*\left|Q\right|/(d*(d2+(L/2)1/2)




The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(Epsilon shouldn't be an exponent)
 
I'm having trouble putting the correct formula in on my smartphone, so I just mean the standard formula for electricnfield between two charged rods. Can someone please answer?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top