Electric Field between two charged plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field between two charged parallel plates, which are 7.5 cm apart. The electrostatic force acting on an electron is given as 1.3 × 10^-15 N. The user initially attempts to find the electric field using the formula E = F/q, questioning whether the uniform electric field assumption is valid due to the plates' size. After correcting the charge of the electron to -1.602 x 10^-19 C, the user recalculates the electric field magnitude to be approximately 8.11 x 10^3 N/C. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using the correct charge value for accurate calculations.
ft92
Messages
19
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two large, parallel, conducting plates are 7.5 cm apart and have charges of equal magnitude and opposite sign on their facing surfaces. An electrostatic force of 1.3 × 10-15 N acts on an electron placed anywhere between the two plates. (Neglect fringing.)

Find the magnitude of the electric field at the position of the electron

Homework Equations


E= F/q

The Attempt at a Solution


Hi, my question is: Can I solve the problem by simply considering the plates large and close enough to make the Electric field between them uniform and apply E= F/q to find the electric field? that is:

E= 1.3 x 10-15/1.67 x 10-19 = 7.78 x 103 N/C ?

It feels like I'm ignoring the information of the distance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually when a problem says that something is "large" without saying exactly how large, it's meant to imply that a simplifying assumption can be made. In this case it means that you can treat the electric field as being uniform as you suggested.

You'll want to check the value you've used for the charge on an electron :wink:
 
Thanks for your reply!
Ok, if I use for the charge of the electron -1.602 x 10-19 i get : 1.3 x 10-15/ -1.602 x 10-19= -8.11x 10-3 N/C correct?
 
Last edited:
That looks better :smile:
 
actually without the minus sign because I'm asked for the magnitude only
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top