Electric Field Between Two Charged Rings: Problem Solved

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linus Pauling
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    E-field Rings
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the electric field between two charged rings, each with a diameter of 10 cm and a charge of +50.0 nC, positioned 19.0 cm apart. At the midpoint between the rings, the electric field is zero due to symmetry, as the field lines from both rings cancel each other out. Similarly, the electric field at the center of one ring is also zero because the contributions from the ring itself cancel. The problem emphasizes the importance of recognizing the uniform charge distribution and symmetry in determining electric fields in such configurations. Overall, the key takeaway is that the electric field strength at both specified points is zero.
Linus Pauling
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
1. Two 10-cm-diameter charged rings face each other, 19.0 cm apart. Both rings are charged to + 50.0 nC. What is the electric field strength:

At the midpoint between the two rings? At the center of the left ring?




2. E = q/4pi*ep_o*r^2



3. The online problem says this is from a certain chapter in our book... that chapter (which we've read) is about point charges. Am I able to treat these things as point charges? I would think not given the small distances being considered... so think maybe it's a typo. Anyways, could someone outline the strategy for this type of problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the answer zero in both cases? Since they're both positively charged, the field lines will point into the space between the rings, but then curve upwards as they come together since they're the same sign, so the middle is zero? Likewise, the center of one ring is zero because the y component of the field from that ring cancels out?
 
The field at the midpoint is 0 because of the symmetry of the configuration. Likewise, the field at the center of a ring due to that ring is 0, again due to symmetry. You still have to consider the electric field produced by the other ring, which isn't 0.
 
Well, if I remember, the field at a point is the force experienced by unit charge at the point so they could say point charges come into it, haw haw.

This one is asking for a minimum of physical intuition I guess. The first problem is very symmetrical. As preliminary, a still simpler situation, what is the net result force on a charge just half way between to equal point charges (both of the same sign)?

Moving on to the rings, you can assume the distribution of charge is uniform around the ring. Makes a very symmetrical situation.

In the second problem, the field is (still) the (vector, i.e. directional) sum of the field due to the two different rings. That from the ring it's in the centre of is an extremely symmetrical situation.

3/4 of the question requires no calculation really. :wink:
 
2 other posts came in whilst I was typing mine. If you mean to say points equally distant from equal charges the field is zero, agreed.

Agree field from ring in its centre is zero. So that leaves you with only the second part of the second problem.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top