Electric field, direction and magnitude

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field due to a uniformly charged rod at a specific point. The user initially calculated the electric field magnitude as 6.17 * 10^5 N/C, while the correct answer is 1.59 * 10^6 N/C. A key point raised is the importance of considering the direction of the electric field as a vector, which may have been overlooked in the calculations. The user is advised to refer to textbooks for clarification on the electric field due to a wire and to ensure the correct interpretation of the axis of the rod. Accurate calculations require careful consideration of both magnitude and direction.
minifhncc
Messages
46
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rod 14.0 cm long is uniformly charged and has a total charge of -22.0μC. Determine
(a) the magnitude and
(b) direction of the electric field along the axis of the rod at a point 36.0 cm from its centre.

[I can do (b)]

Homework Equations



Electric field at the point due to a small element, ΔE=(k Δq)/(x^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


I got down to the total field at P being,
(kQ/l) * integral of 1/x^2 from x=0.29 and x=0.43

and I get 6.17 * 10^5 NC^-1

But the answer says 1.59 * 10^6 NC^-1

Are the answers wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The given answer is right, how did you get that wrong value?

ehild
 
ehild said:
how did you get that wrong value?

(kQ/l) * integral of 1/x^2 from x=0.29 and x=0.43

= 8.9876* 10^9 * -22 * 10^-6 / 0.14 ... etc
 
minifhncc said:
(kQ/l) * integral of 1/x^2 from x=0.29 and x=0.43

= 8.9876* 10^9 * -22 * 10^-6 / 0.14 ... etc

And what is in place of etc?

ehild
 
I don't think you have considered the direction of E.
E is a vector, and you need to treat the two components separately.
Check any book for the field due to a wire, and you'll understand what you've missed.
 
It depends what is meant on "axis of the rod". It should be the straight line along the rod.

ehild
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top