Electric Field due to a charged conducting finite cylindrical shell.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field between two charged conducting finite cylindrical shells and the applicability of Gauss's law in this scenario. It is clarified that Gauss's law cannot be used for finite cylinders, which complicates the calculation of the electric field. The derived electric field formula leads to a potential that approaches infinity at infinity, raising concerns about its validity. To find the capacitance, the potential must be integrated correctly, resulting in the formula C=(2*Pi*epsilon_0*Length)/log((second radius)/(first radius)). Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining the electric field and capacitance in this context.
ed2288
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. I'm having a bit of trouble with finding an electric field. Basically, I'm trying to understand the formula for a cylindrical capacitor, so the method involves integrating the field between two conducting cylindrical shells. Firstly can Gauss's law be used in this case, because the cylinder is finite? Are the field lines all radial, even at the very end of the cylinder? If so, this leads to my next problem. The field turns out to be:
(charge/2*Pi*Length*epsilon_0*radius)
So, when you integrate this to obtain the potential, you will end up with a natural logarithm, meaning at infinity, the potential is infinity!? I'm sure this is wrong but I just can't see where the error is. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Gauss theorem CANNOT be used for finite charged cylinder.
 
Ok then, but how can you calculate the field inbetween the two finite cylinders? You need the field so you can integrate it to get the potential, which you can then use to calculate the capacitance, which, I'm told, turns out to be
C=(2*Pi*epsilon_0*Length)/log((second radius)/(first radius))
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top