Electric Field due to a charged hallow cylinder/solid cylinder on a point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field due to a uniformly charged thin-walled right circular cylindrical shell and a solid cylinder, both with total charge Q, radius R, and height h. The original poster attempts to determine the electric field at a point a distance d from the right side of the cylinder, treating the cylinder as a collection of ring charges for the hollow case and disk charges for the solid case.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of integrals for calculating the electric field from both a hollow cylinder and a solid cylinder. The original poster describes their attempts to apply the ring and disk equations, questioning the substitution of charge elements (dq) and the integration process. Others provide insights into the mathematical approach and suggest clarifications regarding the integration of charge distributions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the correct approach to integrate the electric field contributions from the charged cylinders. There is an ongoing exploration of the mathematical details, with some participants questioning the accuracy of expressions and substitutions used in the calculations. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being discussed without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note confusion regarding the application of charge element substitutions (dq) in the context of the disk equation and the integration process for the solid cylinder. There is also mention of potential errors in the original poster's calculations and the need for clarification on the derivation of integrands from the textbook.

Qbit42
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a uniformy charged thin-walled right circular cylindrical shell having total charge Q, radius R, and height h. Determine the electric field at a point a distance d from the right side of the cylinder (treat the cylinder as a collection of ring charges). Consider now a solid cylinder with the same dimenstions carrying the same charge,uniformly distrubted through its volume (treat the cylinder as a collection of disk charges)

Homework Equations


Ring Electric Field: [tex]\int \frac{kx dq}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]

Disk Electric Field: [tex]\int \frac{kx\pi\sigma 2rdr}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]

The disk equation is derived from the ring equation by treating a disk as a series of rings of infinitesimal radius and integrating using the substition [tex]dq = \pi\sigma 2rdr[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


For the first portion of the problem I started with the Ring Equation and used the equation [tex]dq = \lambda dx[/tex]. This gave me
[tex]k\lambda\int \frac{xdx}{(x^{2} + R^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]
Using the substitution [tex]u = (x^{2} + R^{2}), du = 2xdx[/tex] I have
[tex]\frac{k\lambda}{2}\int \frac{du}{u^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{-k\lambda}{\sqrt{u}}|^{d+h}_{d} = k\lambda(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^{2} + R^{2}}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{(d+h)^{2} + R^{2}}})[/tex]

I went online to compare my results with others and found someone had asked the https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=188011" as myself. My answer seems to follow their line of logic. However I can't get an appropriate answer for the 2nd part of the problem. It seems to me like I'd just take the same approach and just plug [tex]dq = \rho dV =\rho\pi r^{2}dx[/tex] into the Disk equation. However they replaced [tex]dq[/tex] already, and if I go back and plug my [tex]dq[/tex] into the ring equation (like the book did with it's [tex]dq[/tex]) then I just end up with the same equation as above. Specifically I get

[tex]\rho k\pi R^{2}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^{2} + R^{2}}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{(d+h)^{2} + R^{2}}})[/tex].

But since [tex]\rho = \frac{Q}{V} = \frac{Q}{\pi R^{2} h}[/tex] and [tex]\lambda = \frac{Q}{h}[/tex] both equations reduce down to

[tex]\frac{kQ}{h}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{d^{2} + R^{2}}} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{(d+h)^{2} + R^{2}}})[/tex].

Any help is greatly appreciated
 

Attachments

  • scan0001.jpg
    scan0001.jpg
    50.6 KB · Views: 1,580
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anybody?
 
Your expression for the disk is wrong. You seem to understand the approach to solve the problem conceptually, but you don't seem to get the math quite yet. I'll show how you'd go about getting the electric field for the disk. You want to follow a similar approach to solve the cylinder problem.

In the integral for the electric field due to a charged ring of radius a,

[tex] \int \frac{kx dq}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} [/tex]

[itex]dq[/itex] represents the charge of an infinitesimal piece of the ring. The rest of the integrand is constant, so you get

[tex] \int \frac{kx dq}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{kx}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} \int dq = \frac{kxQ}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]

where Q is the total charge on the ring. So far so good.

Now when you calculate the electric field of a disk with uniform charge density [itex]\sigma[/itex], you can think of the disk as a collection of rings. A ring of radius r and thickness dr has a charge [itex]dq=\sigma 2\pi r dr[/itex], so its contribution to the electric field will be

[tex] dE = \frac{kxdq}{(x^{2} + r^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} = \frac{kx(2\pi \sigma r dr)}{(x^{2} + r^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}}[/tex]

Note that the radius of the ring is no longer equal to the constant a. To get the total electric field of the disk, you'll now have to integrate. Once you have that result, then you can use it to calculate the field due to the solid cylinder, modeling the cylinder as a collection of disks.
 
I understand that logic (at least I think I do), actually my textbook goes through the problem of representing a disk as a series of rings, but I couldn't gather how to apply that approach to a cylinder (thus my confusion). Specifically my book says:

[tex]\int \frac{kx\pi\sigma 2rdr}{(x^{2} + r^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} = 2\pi k\sigma(1 - \frac{x}{(x^{2} + r^{2})^{1/2}})[/tex].

However in all the previous problems they have gone back to a more basic equation involving [tex]dq[/tex] and substituted either [tex]dq = \lambda dx[/tex] or [tex]dq = \sigma dA[/tex] or [tex]dq = \rho dV[/tex] into the integral. Since the disk equation does not contain a [tex]dq[/tex] I can't see how to apply the previous examples to this problem. I assume its not as simple as taking the disk equation and sticking a [tex]dx[/tex] onto the end of it
 
Last edited:
I wanted to make a point about your calculation for the hollow cylinder. I think your answer is correct, but that was an accident. Your method happened to work because the expression for the electric field of the ring happens to look like the original integrand with dq replaced by Q. The correct method is to start with the integrated expression, replace Q with dq for the cylinder, and then integrate.
 
Wow that is a fluke, Thanks a lot I really appreciate it!
 
Qbit42 said:
Specifically my book says:

[tex]\int \frac{kx\pi\sigma 2rdr}{(x^{2} + a^{2})^{\frac{3}{2}}} = 2\pi k\sigma(1 - \frac{x}{(x^{2} + r^{2})^{1/2}})[/tex].
That can't be right because you have an [itex]a[/itex] on the lefthand side, and it doesn't appear on the righthand side.

Do you understand how the book came up with original integrands? If you get that, the problems are relatively straightforward.
 
Oh that's my bad that a should be a r, in my haste when making the forum post I just copied the Ring intergral and changed it into the one for the disk. I apperently missed that :blushing:

Yeah now I see how it all fits together, I just happened to make the fluke and mess up the rest because of it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K