Electric Field Due to Infinite Line Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the electric field from an infinite line charge using integration based on the inverse square law. Participants confirm the integral setup is correct and suggest placing the wire along the x-axis for convenience. They clarify the variables involved, with r as a displacement vector within the wire and r' as a constant displacement vector for the field calculation. Concerns arise regarding the limits of integration, with suggestions to initially set finite limits and then take the limit as L approaches infinity to avoid divergence. The key observation is that the limit of the integral simplifies to a manageable form, leading to the conclusion that the electric field can be derived effectively.
SimbaTheLion
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Compute the electric field due to an infinite line charge by integrating the expression obtained from the inverse square law."

Homework Equations



I think that the equation required is:

E(\bold{r}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{(\bold{r} - \bold{r}') \sigma}{|\bold{r} - \bold{r}'|^3} dx

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I don't know what to put in the above integral for r and r', or even if the above integral is even right...

Thanks for any help :) .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks correct.

Build a coordinate system. Include the wire in some convenient place, like along the x-axis. The wire will extend to plus and minus infinite x. As presented, the integral already assumes the wire lies parallel to the x-axis.

r is a displacement vector that varies with x, and locates points within the wire.

r' is a displacement vector of the point for which we wish to calculate the electric field. It is a constant with respect to the variable of integration, x.
 
im working on the same problem. it appears that if infinite limits of integration are used the expression blows up, is it better to set the limits from 0-> L and then take the limit as L goes to infinity?
 
Mmm, I'm getting an integral of something similar to 1/x² between -infinity and infinity, that doesn't look good...
 
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}= \left( \frac{x}{y^2 \sqrt{y^2+x^2}} \right) |_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

The main observation you need to make to solve this is:

\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x}{y^2 \sqrt{y^2+x^2}} = \frac{1}{y^2}

Since x is a first order variable on both the numerator and denominator.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top