Electric Field Due to Infinite Line Charge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on computing the electric field from an infinite line charge using integration based on the inverse square law. Participants confirm the integral setup is correct and suggest placing the wire along the x-axis for convenience. They clarify the variables involved, with r as a displacement vector within the wire and r' as a constant displacement vector for the field calculation. Concerns arise regarding the limits of integration, with suggestions to initially set finite limits and then take the limit as L approaches infinity to avoid divergence. The key observation is that the limit of the integral simplifies to a manageable form, leading to the conclusion that the electric field can be derived effectively.
SimbaTheLion
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



"Compute the electric field due to an infinite line charge by integrating the expression obtained from the inverse square law."

Homework Equations



I think that the equation required is:

E(\bold{r}) = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{(\bold{r} - \bold{r}') \sigma}{|\bold{r} - \bold{r}'|^3} dx

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I don't know what to put in the above integral for r and r', or even if the above integral is even right...

Thanks for any help :) .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your equation looks correct.

Build a coordinate system. Include the wire in some convenient place, like along the x-axis. The wire will extend to plus and minus infinite x. As presented, the integral already assumes the wire lies parallel to the x-axis.

r is a displacement vector that varies with x, and locates points within the wire.

r' is a displacement vector of the point for which we wish to calculate the electric field. It is a constant with respect to the variable of integration, x.
 
im working on the same problem. it appears that if infinite limits of integration are used the expression blows up, is it better to set the limits from 0-> L and then take the limit as L goes to infinity?
 
Mmm, I'm getting an integral of something similar to 1/x² between -infinity and infinity, that doesn't look good...
 
\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{dx}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}}= \left( \frac{x}{y^2 \sqrt{y^2+x^2}} \right) |_{-\infty}^{+\infty}

The main observation you need to make to solve this is:

\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \frac{x}{y^2 \sqrt{y^2+x^2}} = \frac{1}{y^2}

Since x is a first order variable on both the numerator and denominator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top