Electric Field from two lines of charge on the y-axis.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a point on the x-axis due to two line charges on the y-axis, one positive and one negative. The user initially attempted to solve the problem using calculus but struggled to arrive at the correct answer of 1.567×10^5 N/C. Another participant suggested breaking the problem into two segments for the positive and negative charges, calculating the electric field components separately, and then combining them. They provided a formula for the x-component of the electric field, emphasizing the importance of considering the geometry of the setup. The conversation highlights the need for careful integration and vector addition to solve the problem accurately.
ArtemRose
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I was given this assignment for homework, and got it wrong, but now I'm studying for the first exam, and I still can't find out where I went awry. The problem is:

A charge per unit length λ = +8.00 μC/m is uniformly distributed along the positive y-axis from y = 0 to y = +a = +0.500 m. A charge per unit length λ = -8.00 μC/m, is uniformly distributed along the negative y-axis from y = 0 to y = –a = -0.500 m. What is the magnitude of the electric field at a point on the x-axis a distance x = 0.371 m from the origin?

1.567×105 N/C This being the answer I am supposed to get.

Homework Equations


Now, I know that I can find this using the calculus with dE=k*(dq/r^2) dy

The Attempt at a Solution



Now, set the equation to be dE=k*lambda*y/(y^2 + (.371)^2)^(3/2) dy

Then when I took the derivative, it would be then E=k*lambda/(sqrt(y^2 + (.371)^2) + Constant

And then I plug in for y, but it's nowhere near the right answer. Where am I going wrong? I've tried another method to solve for line of charge
[ ((k*8e-6)/.371)*(.5/sqrt(.5^2 + .371^2)) ] (that is, [ ((k*lambda)/x)*(y/sqrt(y^2 + x^2)) ] equaling the E Field.
without using calculus, and that gave me an answer within the bounds, but I didn't have to double it when it should be giving me only the answer for one of the lines of charge, so that makes me doubt that method.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi rose

you can consider two different segments...one from y=0 to y=0.5 which has positive charge and one from y=0 to y=-0.5 which has negative charge. then the problem reduces to find the magnitude of the E due to these two configurations at point P (say) on the x-axis and then add them with proper signs...for each of the segment, the point P is at some distance from one end of the segment... you need to find the x and y components of the total electric field
at point P due to both the segments... for example the x component would be given by

E_x=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_o}\int_0^L \frac{\lambda\,dy}{(y^2+x^2)}\cos{\theta}

where \cos{\theta}=\frac{x}{(y^2+x^2)^\frac{1}{2}}
a
where \lambda would be line charge density and x is the distance of the point P from the origin and y is the distance of the differential element dy from the origin. L in each case would be 0.5...

that may help a bit
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top