Electric field in a dielectric material

noblegas
Messages
266
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A very long cylinder of liner dielectric materil is placed in an otherwise uniform electric field <b>E_0</b> . Find the resulting field within the cylinder. (the radius is a , the susceptibililty \chi_e and the axis is perpendicular to <b>E_0</b>)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



V_in(r,\theta)= \sigma(l=0..infinity)A_l*r^l*P_l(cos(\theta)

should I take the derivative of V_in with respect to r to obtain the field? Not sure why latex isn't display infiinity but l is supposed to range from zero to infinity

I also know that E_0 = \lambda/(2*\pi*\epsilon_0*a)

P_0=\epsilon_0*\chi_e*E_0 P=\epsilon*\chi_e*E ; should I plugged \chi_e=P/(E_0*\epsilon_0) into P to get E?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you using the general solution of Laplace's equation in Spherical coordinates (with azimuthal symmetry), when cylindrical coordinates are more appropriate?
 
gabbagabbahey said:
Why are you using the general solution of Laplace's equation in Spherical coordinates (with azimuthal symmetry), when cylindrical coordinates are more appropriate?

You are right. I just realized that. Is my approach to the problem correct? I should not necessarily assume that the length of a very long cylinder is approaching infinity?
 
I would assume that the cylinder is infinitely long...Are there any symmetries present (eg. axial, radial, azimuthal etc.)? What is the general solution to Laplace's equation in cylindrical coordinates with these symmetries?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top