Electric field of a point charge inside a sphere

melodyyyylwy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a)Consider a charged sphere of radius R centred at the origin with the spherically symmetric charge density ρ(r) = ρ0(r4/R4) where ρ0 is a constant and r is the radial coordinate.
Find the charge dQ0 contained in a spherical shell of radius r0 < R and infinitesimal thickness dr0.
Hence find the charge Q(r) contained inside the sphere as a function of
r < R.
Using Gauss’s law in integral form, determine the magnitude of the radial electric field Er(r) inside the sphere as a function of r < R.
Using the fact that \underline{∇}\cdotE(r) = \frac{1}{r^2}\frac{∂}{∂r}(r2Er(r)) in this case, verify Gauss’s law in
differential form at a general point inside the sphere.

(b) A positive point charge Q is added to a point P0 with position vector R0 with components (1, 1, 1) inside a sphere with the same charge density as in part
(a) apart from the charge Q. Calculate the vector electric field E(r) at a point
P with position vector r with components (1, 2, 1) inside the sphere in terms
of the unit vectors \widehat{x}, \widehat{y}, \widehat{z} and Q and Er (considered in part (a)).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i have done part b of the question already. i am just not quite sure how to deal with a point charge inside a sphere with charge density. Do i just add up the two field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superposition principle.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top