Electric field of concentric rings

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the electric field above the center of two concentric charged rings, with the inner ring having a charge +[Q] and the outer ring a linear charge density λ. The electric field is zero at a height of z=2R, prompting a calculation for λ. One participant points out a mistake in the calculation of the electric field E_2, specifically in the denominator, suggesting it should be adjusted to include the correct terms. Another participant agrees and plans to re-evaluate their calculations based on this feedback. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the derived formula for the electric field of a charged ring.
cookiemnstr510510
Messages
162
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Derive the electric field a distance, z, above the center of a single uniformly charged ring of radius, R, with a linear charge density, λ. You are now given two uniformly charged concentric rings. The inner ring has radius, R, and carries a uniformly distributed total charge +[Q]. The outer ring has radius 3R and carries a uniform charge per length, λ. If the resulting electric field from the two rings is zero at an axial height of z=2R above the centers of the two rings, determine the value of λ.

Im wondering if I've solved for λ correctly

Homework Equations


All relevant equations and work are attached in with clean typed images/work

The Attempt at a Solution


All relevant equations and work are attached in with clean typed images/work

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • Concentric Ring 1.png
    Concentric Ring 1.png
    28.1 KB · Views: 621
  • Concentric Ring 2.png
    Concentric Ring 2.png
    16.7 KB · Views: 647
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have a mistake in the calculation of ##E_2##. The denominator should be ##{((2R)^2+(3R)^2)}^{3/2}##.

But I see no reason why you repeat the calculation. I mean you already found that the electric field at distance z above the centre due to a uniformed charged ring of radius R . Just apply this result for radius R=3R (if I can write it that way but I guess you ll understand what I mean).
 
  • Like
Likes cookiemnstr510510
Delta² said:
I think you have a mistake in the calculation of ##E_2##. The denominator should be ##{((2R)^2+(3R)^2)}^{3/2}##.

But I see no reason why you repeat the calculation. I mean you already found that the electric field at distance z above the centre due to a uniformed charged ring of radius R . Just apply this result for radius R=3R (if I can write it that way but I guess you ll understand what I mean).
Ahhh okay, yes you're correct. okay, Ill try that out and see what λ I get
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top