Electric Field of Two Charged Plates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field between two charged plates, with one plate negatively charged and the other positively charged. For the first problem, it's noted that the distance to point B is not necessary for determining the electric field, as it remains uniform between the plates. The second problem involves finding the charge per unit area on a plate given a uniform electric field strength, with a calculation provided that suggests a charge density of 4.25x10^-7 C/m^2. Participants express confusion over the completeness of the questions and the clarity of accompanying diagrams. Overall, the key takeaway is that the electric field between parallel plates is uniform and independent of distance.
Physics197
Messages
70
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. If two plates, 1.0 cm by 1.0 cm, with charges of −2.30 µC and +2.30 µC, what is the magnitude of the electric field at b?
+++++++++++++
...b
-----------------

2. A uniform electric field of strength E = 4.80×10^4 N/C is observed in the region adjacent to a large, uniformly charged plate. What is the charge per unit area on the plate?
ll---->
ll---->
ll---->
ll---->
bar ll E field -->


Homework Equations



E=F/Q
E= sum kq1/(d1)^2
density = E*\epsilono
\epsilon = 8.85x10^-12

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure how to solve 1, due to the distance from the plate to B is not given.

for 2, I thought it would just be (8.85x10^-12)(4.80x10^4) = 4.25x10^-7 C/m^2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for part (1):

have a look at this figure which shows the electric field produced from the plates:

http://img189.imageshack.us/img189/2665/29517379.jpg


the electric field between two oppositely charged parallel plates is uniform in any region between them , so what that tells you?

for part (2):

did you write the whole question?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So for 1, the distance has no effect on the electric field.

and for #2, I copied and pasted the question exactly, I too felt like something was missing.
 
for question(1) .. You are correct the distance doesn't matter .. And as you can notice the electric field between the plates is just the vector addition of the electric field of each one which is simply 2E (here E is the electric field from one plate since it is the same for both) ..

For question (2) I am sorry i don't understand the drawing you made .. Can you please scan the figure from the book or make a better drawing and attach it , maybe then i would be able to help. .
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top