Electric Field Problem (why don't I multiply by sin and cos?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net electric field at point P due to three charged particles. The main point of contention is the misunderstanding of vector components in the context of electric field magnitude. It is clarified that while the electric field is a vector, the problem only requires the magnitude, which does not involve multiplying by trigonometric functions like (cos45 + sin45). Instead, the correct approach is to find the distance between the charge and point P without incorporating vector components into the distance calculation. Ultimately, the magnitude of the electric field depends solely on the charges and their distances, not on angles.
blackbrawler
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the figure the three particles are fixed in place and have charges q1 = q2 = +e and q3 = 2e. Distance a = 6.00 µm. What is the magnitude of the net electric field at point P due to the particles?

NAhIr74.gif


Homework Equations


E = k*q/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution



I looked in the back of the book and it shows that I shouldn't be multiplying by (cos45 + sin45) but I don't understand why since Electric Field is a vector value

here is my work

q1 and q2 cancel out so i only calculate q3

F = 9*10^9 * (3.2/(6^2/2)) * 10^-13 * (cos45 + sin45)

simplifies to
F = 160 * sqrt 2 = 226.274N

The actual answer is just 160N so that means I shouldn't multiply by (cos45 + sin45) even though that is the angle.

Edit: picture should be viewable
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The image isn't displaying.
 
Maybe_Memorie said:
The image isn't displaying.

can you see it now?
 
It's important to know that r is the physical distance between the charge and the point where you want to calculate the field. You can't plug in vector components for r because it's a scaler. I think you assumed that r=6 um, but you actually don't have the value for r yet. You need to find the actual distance between q3 and P.
 
flatmaster said:
It's important to know that r is the physical distance between the charge and the point where you want to calculate the field. You can't plug in vector components for r because it's a scaler. I think you assumed that r=6 um, but you actually don't have the value for r yet. You need to find the actual distance between q3 and P.

i kind of skipped some of the steps but I did calculate r as sqrt(a^2/2) to get r^2 = 6um^2/2
 
blackbrawler said:
i kind of skipped some of the steps but I did calculate r as sqrt(a^2/2) to get r^2 = 6um^2/2

Double check that.
 
flatmaster said:
Double check that.

a^2 = 2r^2

(a^2)/2 = r^2

sqrt((a^2)/2) = r
 
Electric field is a vector, but the question indicates that it's only asking for the magnitude, so that's why you can disregard the direction.
 
jackarms said:
Electric field is a vector, but the question indicates that it's only asking for the magnitude, so that's why you can disregard the direction.


but isn't the magnitude effected by the direction or angle?

If I'm applying a force at a 45 degree angle the amount it moves is different than if I apply it at a 90 degree angle.
 
  • #10
Depends. For torque it matters because the equation involves a vector product, which necessarily invokes direction. For electric field magnitude only depends on charges and distance, which are both scalars. Angle affects the amount of magnitude in the x and y directions, but not the total magnitude.
 
  • #11
blackbrawler said:
F = 9*10^9 * (3.2/(6^2/2)) * 10^-13 * (cos45 + sin45)
There is no logical basis for the term (cos45 + sin45). If the field is E (vector) it has X and Y components |E|cos45 and |E|sin45, but you cannot add those together. To combine perpendicular components of a vector to find its magnitude you use the root-sum-square formula, which, of course, produce the answer |E|.
 
Back
Top