Electric field strength from x=-a to x = a

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding electric field strength at the point x = 0 between two opposite charges. It is initially believed that the electric field should be zero at this point due to the equal and opposite vectors. However, it is clarified that the electric fields from the charges actually point in the same direction toward the negative charge, resulting in a maximum electric field strength at x = 0. The conversation highlights the importance of careful analysis in physics problems, regardless of their perceived simplicity. Understanding vector directions is crucial in determining the resultant electric field strength.
physiccool78
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I attached a file.

Numbers 10 and 12.

Homework Equations



kQq/r, kQq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused about this problem. Shouldn't the electric field strength be 0 when x = 0? The charges are opposite and adding two opposite vectors with equal magnitude should be 0 right? So how come the answer says that the electric field strength is the greatest at x = 0 then? Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • photo 1.JPG
    photo 1.JPG
    29.2 KB · Views: 442
  • photo 2.JPG
    photo 2.JPG
    35.8 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
They are in opposite positions on the y axis,so the vectors of the electric fields point in the same direction.They both point to the negative charge.
 
Wow... Thank you and now I feel embarrassed for asking this question! I can't believe I overlooked this. Thank you.
 
Just be a little more patient with physics problems,however simple or confusing they might be.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top