Electric Field Vanishing at Infinity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying regions where the electric field equals zero at a finite distance from multiple charges. Participants emphasize the need to analyze the contributions of each charge to the electric field in various regions, particularly between points A, B, and C. It is clarified that the electric field from each charge can be represented as vectors, which must be added together to determine if they can cancel each other out. The importance of drawing these vectors in different regions is highlighted to visualize the equilibrium points. Understanding how to incorporate multiple charges into the electric field equation is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
ihearyourecho
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The electric field on the dashed line in the figure vanishes at infinity, but also at two different points a finite distance from the charges.

Identify the regions in which you can find E = 0 at a finite distance from the charges.


Check all that apply:
A)to the right of point C
B)between points A and B
C)to the left of point A
D) between points B and C

See Image:
http://tinypic.com/r/15g8o6w/6

Homework Equations


E=kq/r^2


The Attempt at a Solution


I'm afraid that all I know is the formula, but I'm not sure how I'm supposed to apply it. Am I supposed to set E=0 or.. what? I feel like all I need is some direction in how to start and then I'll be able to get it.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are given four choices. Pick the first one and draw the electric field contributions from each of the three charges at the point as described. Can these arrows conceivably add up to give you zero?
 
I guess what I don't understand is how to incorporate multiple charges into the equation. It just has room for one q. The way you're saying, don't I need to try to find the electric field between two of the charges?
 
I would put A and C for that problem since you can interpret an Efield in terms of vectors.

The direction of the Efield would be that in which a Positive Charge would flow towards... Let's look at it now.

A) To the right of Point C
Lets Analyze it: If you put a positive charge, it will be repelled by the E field from B and C but attracted by that of A *therefore allowing it to eventually reach static equilibrium once its far enough from A in order for b and c to cancel the Efield of A*

B) Between points A and B

A will attract it but B and C will push it to the left, therefore it would not reach electrostatic equilibrium in the middle of the two charges (since ALL CHARGES ARE OF EQUAL MAGNITUDE)

I wasnt that clear... ask me if you don't understand what I said (I tend to ramble a lot :D)

I might be wrong with this explanation though, but I would put that on a test
 
ihearyourecho said:
I guess what I don't understand is how to incorporate multiple charges into the equation. It just has room for one q.
I suppose you are referring to E = kq/r2. That is is the magnitude of the electric field of a single point charge at distance r and the field itself can be represented by an arrow pointing in the appropriate direction. If you have two point charges, each of the charges contributes its own arrow at that point so you need to draw two arrows and add them as vectors.
The way you're saying, don't I need to try to find the electric field between two of the charges?
I am saying that in each region of space you need to draw three arrows representing the individual contributions from each charge. Then figure out if these arrows can conceivably add up to zero. For example, if all three arrows point in the same direction, they cannot add up to zero, can they? "Finding" the electric field involves adding the contributions from each charge as vectors.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top