Electric Fields and Gauss' Law with a Conducting Sphere

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the charges on a conducting shell surrounding an insulating sphere using Gauss' Law. The insulating sphere has a charge of -4, leading to a charge of +4 on the inner surface of the conducting shell at radius b. The net charge outside the conducting shell is stated to be -12, which implies that the outer surface charge at radius c must be -8 to maintain this balance. Confusion arises regarding the role of the insulating sphere's charge in determining the outer surface charge, with some participants suggesting it should affect the overall charge distribution. Ultimately, the correct interpretation is that the charges on the inner and outer surfaces of the conducting shell must sum to match the net charge outside.
soccersquirt8
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't about a specific problem, but it is based off of a homework problem. There is an insulating sphere (from radius 0 to a), and it is concentric with a spherical conducting shell (from radius b to c). If I know the charge of the insulating sphere and the net charge OUTSIDE of the conducting shell, I should be able to find the charge at radius b and the charge at radius c.

Homework Equations



qenc=epsilon*int(E dot dA)

The Attempt at a Solution



I know the spherical conducting shell must have E=0, which makes the charge at radius b equal to the negative of the charge in the insulating sphere. For clarity, I will say that the insulating charge has a charge q=-4, making the charge at radius b equal to +4. If the net charge equals -12 outside the conducting shell, then I have been told that the charge at radius c would be -8.

I can see that -8-4=-12, but I would think the charge in the insulating charge would play a part. I would think it would cancel out the charge at radius b as it did inside the conducting shell. If that were the case, then I would think the charge at radius c would be -12 because -12-4+4=-12, which is what I want. For it to be the other way like I was told, it seems like the -4 charge at radius b is acting twice, once to cancel out the +4 charge inside the insulating sphere and again to effect the charge at radius c. I drew electric field vectors outside of the conducting sphere, and I am only getting that the -4 charge canceling out the +4 charge, making the charge at radius c equal to the net charge. But apparently that is not right. Where is my line of thinking going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The specific words used to describe the situation are VERY important.

Saying that "the net charge equals -12 outside the conducting shell" (I would take this to mean on the outer surface of the conducting shell.) says that you already know the charge on the outer surface (at r=c). The net charge on the conducting shell would be ‒12 + 4 = ‒8 .

However, if the textbook is saying that the net charge on the conducting shell is -12, the fact that the inner surface (r=b) has a charge of +q means that the charge on the outer surface is -16, because +4 + (-16) = -12 .
 
For all r>c, the net charge equals -12.

Going with your situation, where did the -4 charge factor in? It didn't seem like it played a part at all.
 
soccersquirt8 said:
For all r>c, the net charge equals -12.

Going with your situation, where did the -4 charge factor in? It didn't seem like it played a part at all.
It causes the charge on the inner surface of the shell (r=b) to be +4.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top