Electric Fields/ Electric Potential

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field strength and potential between two parallel metal plates with a 1500V potential difference. The electric field strength at point P is correctly calculated as 7.5 x 10^4 V/m, considering the uniform field between the plates. A misunderstanding arises regarding the potential difference at point P, which is not the full 1500V but rather half, due to its position between the plates. Participants clarify that the electric field remains constant throughout the space between the plates, reinforcing the linear relationship between potential and distance. The importance of accurately representing this relationship in a graph is emphasized, with the suggestion to use two points for a linear function.
Cilabitaon
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Figure 1 shows a pair of parallel metal plates, A and B, fixed vertically 20mm apart with a potential difference of 1500V between them.
(a)(i) Draw the electric field lines in the space between the plates and calculate the electric field strength at point P.
(a)(ii)Sketch a graph showing the potential at different points in space between the plates.

Homework Equations


E_{f}=\frac{V}{x}


The Attempt at a Solution


The first part is shown in the diagram by my (rather scruffy)red lines; they are drawn better on my actual diagram. :redface:

For the potential at P:

E_{P}=\frac{1500/2}{(20 \times 10^{-3})/2} = 7.5 \times 10^{4}Vm^{-1}

For the last part I have a 100mmx60mm piece of graph paper with the labels 'potential' and 'distance' on the vertical and horizontal axes respectively.

Now, in my thinking all I can get from this is that the graph must start at 0, and the gradient must be E.

c.f. y = mx + c and you get V = Ex (+ 0).

I have my values for V from (0>1500)V on my potential axis and my values for x from (0>20.0)e-3m.

The problem with this is I can see everything that is going on, but I just cannot draw a graph of it; and it's really starting to annoy, so any help would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • EF4a-fig1.jpg
    EF4a-fig1.jpg
    9.1 KB · Views: 1,146
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can draw the graph in the same way you draw any linear function. You know it is a straight line so you only need two points. However you made a mistake in calculating the electric field. You are using the potential difference of 1500V at the point P, but the potential difference between plate A and P is not 1500.
 
Cyosis said:
You can draw the graph in the same way you draw any linear function. You know it is a straight line so you only need two points. However you made a mistake in calculating the electric field. You are using the potential difference of 1500V at the point P, but the potential difference between plate A and P is not 1500.

Right, it's half way between the two plates in a uniform field so the potential drop is half...right?

So this would mean it's just E = \frac{1500/2}{(20 \times 10^{-3})/2} = 7.5 \times 10 ^{4}Vm^{-1}
 
Yes that is correct. You know that the eletric field does not change between the plates so calculating the field at any point gives you the field for all points (within the capacitor).
 
It's quite worrying to me that I had such problems with a V \propto x relationship :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top