Electric Potential Vs. Electric Field

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential and electric field are related but distinct concepts in physics. A high electric potential does not necessarily indicate a high electric field; rather, the electric field is determined by the gradient of the potential. If the electric potential remains constant, the electric field is zero, regardless of the potential's value. The relationship can be expressed mathematically, where the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential. Understanding this correlation is crucial for solving problems involving electric fields and potentials effectively.
pwkellysr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm confused about the correlation between electric potential and electric field. Does a high electric potential mean the electric field is also high?


Homework Equations



E=-(dV/dx, dV/dy, dV/dz) and V(x)=V0 - E x

The Attempt at a Solution



I think not because the electric potential V decreases continuously as we move along the direction of the electric field E which is constant over the range of a potential difference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the electric potential is constant (no matter how high it is), the electric field is zero. Electric field is related to the gradient of the potential, not the size of the potential.
 
Hello pwkellysr,

Welcome to Physics Forums!

Yes, I think you are correct (if I'm understanding you correctly). :approve:

Remember, potential is related to the definite integral of the electric field.

V(B) - V(A) = -\int _A ^B \vec E \cdot d \vec l

I have a helpful hint. After almost forgetting it once and struggling miserably, I now repeat it myself almost every day. A definite integral is the area under the curve between two points.

I'm sure you already know that. But really think about it. It's so easy to forget what it really means.

In in your problem, plot E as a function of x. Well, between points A and B, E is a constant. But now plot the area under the curve from A to x. As x gets larger, so does the area!

As you've already mentioned,

\vec E = - \nabla V

And as you have correctly alluded, that's the same thing as saying the electric field has a constant magnitude, in regions where the electric potential has a constant slope.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top