Electricity: electric field in a point Between Two Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the difference between the cosine rule used in geometry and its application in calculating the resultant electric field between two charges. The standard cosine rule is expressed as a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc cos A, while the electric field formula uses a positive 2, represented as E resultant = root[E1^2 + E2^2 + 2*E1*E2*cos(angle between E1 and E2]. This discrepancy arises because the angle used in the electric field calculation is A = π - θ, leading to the relationship cos(π - θ) = -cos(θ). The formula for the electric field does not require a special name; it is simply an application of vector addition using the cosine rule. Understanding this distinction clarifies the correct application in physics problems.
Epoch
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've seen many books writing the cosine rule like this:
a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc cos A

My electricity textbook for an electric field in a point between two charges says this:
E resultant = root[E1^2 + E2^2 + 2*E1*E2*cos(angle between E1 and E2)]

In the first equation it is -2 and in my textbook it is +2.
Why is this?
Because if I use the -2 in my exercises it is wrong and the +2 is right.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't really have an attempt since it is more a theoretical question.
I understand how to use it, but I don't understand the +2 and -2.
Vectors.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Epoch said:
I've seen many books writing the cosine rule like this:
a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - 2bc cos A
Note that this applies to a triangle. A is the angle between sides b & c of the triangle.

Epoch said:
My electricity textbook for an electric field in a point between two charges says this:
E resultant = root[E1^2 + E2^2 + 2*E1*E2*cos(angle between E1 and E2)]
If you draw a diagram of the vector sum of E1 and E2, you'll see that the angle that applies to the cosine rule is not the angle between those vectors. Instead it is ##A = \pi -
\theta##. Note that ##\cos(\pi -\theta) = -\cos\theta##.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
Doc Al said:
Note that this applies to a triangle. A is the angle between sides b & c of the triangle.If you draw a diagram of the vector sum of E1 and E2, you'll see that the angle that applies to the cosine rule is not the angle between those vectors. Instead it is ##A = \pi -
\theta##. Note that ##\cos(\pi -\theta) = -\cos\theta##.

So is it still called the cosine rule in electricity or does this formula have a specific name?
 
Epoch said:
So is it still called the cosine rule in electricity or does this formula have a specific name?
No reason to give that formula a special name. You're just adding vectors using the cosine rule. (There are other ways to add vectors. This is just one.)
 
Doc Al said:
No reason to give that formula a special name. You're just adding vectors using the cosine rule. (There are other ways to add vectors. This is just one.)
Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top