Electrodynamics: Solve the differential equation

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at the attached circuit, where the current is direct (i.e. DC).

I have found the following differential equation using Kirchoff's laws:

<br /> V=\frac{R_1+R_2}{R_2C}Q+R_1\frac{dQ}{dt}.<br />

I wish to solve this equation, and thus to find Q(t).

The Attempt at a Solution



First I differentiate with respect to t to obtain:<br /> 0=\frac{R_1+R_2}{R_2C}\frac{dQ}{dt}+R_1\frac{d^2Q}{dt^2}.<br />

Solving this gives me the following:<br /> Q(t)=A+B\exp\left( {\frac{R_2+R_1}{R_2R_1C}t} \right),<br />

where I have used the fact that Q(t=0)=0 to find that B=-A. But how do I find A?

Thanks in advance.Niles.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    624 bytes · Views: 412
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Obtain an expression for the current, then find the charge.

Just use the fact the i = dq/dt and di/dt = d^2q/dt^2 and use separation of variables.
 
Niles said:
<br /> Q(t)=A+B\exp\left( {\frac{R_2+R_1}{R_2R_1C}t} \right),<br />

where I have used the fact that Q(t=0)=0 to find that B=-A. But how do I find A?

You need two initial conditions to find the two constants. One is Q(0), the other one? What is the initial current?
 
I am not told what I(0) is, but I guess it is zero. But how will this help me?

And if I solve for I instead of Q, then how can I find the particular solution?
 
Ok, I solved it. I just have to find the final charge on the capacitor, and that is the particular solution.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top