Electromagnetic Radiation and Magnetic Waves

AI Thread Summary
A Faraday Cage effectively blocks electromagnetic radiation, such as radio waves, due to its conductive material, which disrupts electric fields. However, it cannot block static magnetic fields because these fields can penetrate the cage unless it is made from perfect conductors. The effectiveness of the mesh in a Faraday Cage is related to the size of its openings; if the openings are larger than the wavelength of the incoming waves, they can penetrate. Real-world conductors allow low-frequency fields to pass through, while high-frequency fields are more effectively blocked. Understanding these principles is crucial for designing effective Faraday Cages for various applications.
Kbs13
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

First post on these forums, but I've lurked a bit in the past. I'm doing a project on the Faraday Cage, and I have a quick question...

I was wondering why a Faraday Cage can block electromagnetic radiation like a radio wave (which, as far as I can tell, is a "mix" of a magnetic field and an electric field), but it cannot block a magnetic field.

I'm hoping I worded this correctly because I just started learning about Faraday Cages all-day yesterday :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know you guys haven't answered my first question, but rather than start a new topic, I'll just add it onto this topic. Hopefully double posting isn't a big deal on these forums :X

Anyways, what's the relationship between the mesh used on a Faraday Cage and the wavelengths of the waves hitting the cage? I thought the mesh just had to have smaller openings than the wavelengths of the waves hitting it, but I'm not too sure now.
 
A true faraday cage blocks all fields electric and magnetic including DC magnetic fields. But you have to build it out of perfect conductors. Real conductors can be penetrated by low frequency fields, meshes by high frequency fields.
 
Alright, that answers one of my questions, thanks :)

Still looking for an answer to the other one though :redface:
 
Wavelengths of the order of the holes in the mesh begin to penetrate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top