Electromagnetic waves and vector calculus

Pingu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble with electromagnetic waves, perhaps just a vector calculus issue. I'd much appreciate some help in idenfiying it.

If given say an example in an assignment of an electromagnetic wave:

E = E_0 cos (omega(sqrt(sigma.mu) z - t )) X
+ E_0 sin (omega(sqrt(sigma.mu) z - t )) Y

Where bold X & Y have hats on their heads :-D

If so , what is the vector B
I'd immediatley assume that it was the same equation, replaced with B_O's instead of E_0's and swapping the cos's with sins's or the X & Y's.

Simplistic assumption based on the two assumably being mutuall perpendicular and in phase.

That would lead me to be able to identify the poynting vector S
I'm wondering if it is the same solution as a monochromatic plane wave, and furthermore what relationship the magnetic energy density and the electric energy density have, over a suitable averaging.

Thanks for reading, and if you have anything to comment, i'd love to hear it. I'm reading from Griffith Intro to Electro chapter 9 to attempt understanding...

Cheers
Andy :-D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pingu said:
I'm having trouble with electromagnetic waves, perhaps just a vector calculus issue. I'd much appreciate some help in idenfiying it.

If given say an example in an assignment of an electromagnetic wave:

E = E_0 cos (omega(sqrt(sigma.mu) z - t )) X
+ E_0 sin (omega(sqrt(sigma.mu) z - t )) Y

Where bold X & Y have hats on their heads :-D

If so , what is the vector B
I'd immediatley assume that it was the same equation, replaced with B_O's instead of E_0's and swapping the cos's with sins's or the X & Y's.

That's not right. Remember that \vec{E} satisfies Maxwell's equations. So, what do the first 2 equations in vacuum tell you? From this, can you find the magnetic field?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top