Electron and positron annihilation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the collision of an electron and a positron, both traveling at 0.9c, resulting in photon generation. Two methods were employed to calculate the wave vector (k) of the photon: conservation of momentum and conservation of energy. The calculations yielded different results, highlighting the necessity of using both conservation principles to accurately determine the magnitude and direction of the photon. The discrepancy arises because energy conservation alone cannot provide directional information about the resulting photon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity, particularly Lorentz transformations
  • Familiarity with conservation laws in physics, specifically momentum and energy
  • Knowledge of photon properties, including wave vectors and wavelength
  • Basic grasp of particle physics, particularly electron and positron interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in relativistic collisions
  • Explore the concept of wave vectors in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of special relativity on particle interactions
  • Investigate the relationship between energy and momentum for photons
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of particle physics, and anyone interested in the dynamics of high-energy particle collisions and photon generation.

Psi-String
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Problem:An electron flies toward +x direction with velocity of 0.9c, while a positron flies toward -y direction with the same velocity. Assuming their speed is so fast that they collide and annihilate at the origin, what will be the magnitude and the direction of the wave vector of the generated photon, k?

I have two kinds of solution. One is base on conservation of linear momentum, one is base on conservation of energy, but they don't have the same result! Where went wrong??

Method 1
By conservation of momentum,

P_i = \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \hat{i} - \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} \hat{j}

since the magnitude is the same in the two direction, we have

P_{photon} \cos \frac{\pi}{4} = \frac{m_e v}{\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

p = \gamma m_ev \sqrt{2} = \frac{h}{\lambda}

so k = \frac{2\sqrt{2}\pi m_e v}{h\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}}

substitute v=0.9c

k = \frac{1.8\sqrt{2} \pi m_e c}{h \sqrt{1-(0.9)^2}}

Method 2
By conservation of energy

2 \times \gamma m c^2 = \frac{hc}{\lambda}

then

k = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda} = \frac{4 m_e c \pi}{h\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}} = \frac{4 m_e c \pi}{h \sqrt{1-0.9^2}}

why the two method turn out different result??

thanks for help!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't find the direction using energy conservation. This will give you the magnitude of the resulting wave. The momentum of the outgoing wave will the opposite of the vector sum of the incoming photons.
 
I know I can't find the direction of the produced photon by only using conservation of energy, I also need conservation of momentum. But I don't see why the magnitude won't be the same by two different methods. I don't understand your last sentence. What do you mean of "outgoing" wave and "imcoming" wave, it seems to me that there is only "outgoing" wave in the situation.

Thanks for help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
799
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K