Electron moving in magnetic field. (Physics 2, non calc)

AI Thread Summary
Electrons fired eastward near Earth's surface experience a circular trajectory due to the perpendicular magnetic force acting as centripetal force. The magnitude of the Earth's magnetic field is calculated to be 2.38 x 10^-5 T based on the time it takes for the electrons to return to their initial position. To travel in a straight line, the electrons must be fired at an angle that aligns with the horizontal component of the magnetic field, which is known to be 1.9 x 10^-5 T. The discussion clarifies that the only path that avoids a helical trajectory is one parallel to the magnetic field. Understanding the orientation of the magnetic field is crucial for determining the correct firing angle for the electrons.
pdeco1
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Electrons are fired Eastward at a certain location near Earth's surface. Ignore gravity.
A. Describe the motion of the electrons and describe the trajectory they follow.
B. If the electrons first return to their initial positions after 1.5 x 10^-6 seconds, determine the magnitude of the Earth's magnetic field.
C. If it is known that the horizontal component of the magnetic field is 1.9x10^-5 T. In precisely which direction should the electrons be fired so as to travel in a straight line? You may express any angle as an inverse trigonometric function.


Homework Equations


r=mv/qB


The Attempt at a Solution


A. The perpendicular magnetic force acts as centripetal force which keeps the particle in rotation around the Earth changing its direction but not velocity.

B. t= 1.5x10^-6 s, t = (2)(pi)(m)/qB, Solving for B = 2.38x10^-5 T

C.The "horizontal component" is tripping me up. Is there two magnetic fields here? One from the Earth and one from the moving electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi pdeco1! :smile:
pdeco1 said:
A. The perpendicular magnetic force acts as centripetal force which keeps the particle in rotation around the Earth changing its direction but not velocity.

so the shape of the motion is … ? :smile:
C.The "horizontal component" is tripping me up. Is there two magnetic fields here? One from the Earth and one from the moving electron?

no, the Earth's magnetic field is at an angle to the horizontal, different in different places on the Earth …

see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_dip" for details :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A. The path is circular.

Can you offer more advice on part C. My diagram has electron heading east, with the force downwards and the magnetic field rotating in and out of the page, which makes it horizontal to the earth.

While the electron is perpendicular to the Earth it with experience a centripetal force, the force is greatest at 90, and decreases as the angle between the path and the magnetic field decreases. Does the electron need to be fired vertically at 90 degrees to travel in a straight line?
 
hi pdeco1! :smile:
pdeco1 said:
A. The path is circular.

yup! :biggrin: (or helical :wink:)
While the electron is perpendicular to the Earth it with experience a centripetal force, the force is greatest at 90, and decreases as the angle between the path and the magnetic field decreases. Does the electron need to be fired vertically at 90 degrees to travel in a straight line?

the only path that isn't helical is a path parallel to the field :wink:
 
I understand the theory, but I am not sure how to figure out the angles. Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks.
 
The key to the problem was understanding that "horizontal" meant a uniform north field.

Set up the magnetic field values along an xy plane and use SOHCAHTOA to find the angle. The north(horizontal) value is given, combined with the magnetic field calculated from part B and the problem is easily solved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top